The peasant movement is a tragedy and the government can solve this problem only by changing its policy.
The central government is trying to change opinion, not policy, on agricultural bills. But like the Ram temple controversy, this time the elected government cannot take all the decisions to the court so that its own image remains clean.
Thousands of farmers are sitting on a dharna on the borders of Delhi in the midst of a cold winter. Almost two months have passed. Is it just a question of their own opinion, their concept? This is a tragedy and the government can solve this problem only by changing its policy.
This writer had written the same two weeks ago that the government will first try to change the opinion of the people. It was expected that the refusal of the first people should be converted into a contract.
Contrary to the claims of the government and the ruling party, the middle class has sympathy for the farmers. Farmers are putting their lives and livelihood at stake for justice. Now no one believes this argument that farmers have been tricked politically or theoretically. The middle class stands behind the Indian farmers intellectually – irrespective of the state of the farmers, or they speak any language.
This solidarity of ‘far-flung villagers’ and city dwellers is a matter of concern for any elected government. This shows how deep the roots of misrule and exploitation are in our villages. The image of Indian society is something else in the minds of the middle class. But the farmers sitting on the borders of Delhi shed the shadow of rural India in the drawing rooms of the people of the city. Now it can not be turned away.
For this, the committee formed by the Supreme Court, its task is to resolve the deadlock between the farmers and the government. However, all the four members of the committee feel supportive of the agricultural bills and there is no expectation that they would recommend the repeal of these bills.
Farmer- No, because they have already rejected it. Urban middle class – Absolutely not, because he is well aware of these pants. Rural middle class – not at all, because it has hurt the agricultural bills. Very poor people – there is no question, because they are on the mercy of rich people. Rich people – hardly, because they are powerful.
But the judicial system accepts the findings of the committees as correct. These conclusions are hereby changed and applied to the objecting country.
Several attempts were made to change the public opinion towards the farmers:
During this time, the government talked to the farmers eight times and that too failed. It is interesting that the opinion of the farmers with whom one side was being negotiated, on the other, was being formed against them.
What does the way the wind is being made against the farmers show? The attitude of the government suggests that withdrawal of agricultural bills is like drinking sips of insults for it. However, the way leaders are taking these bills personally, it is foolish.
Because there are so many shortcomings in these bills that any leader should avoid adding his name to it. Apart from this, it should also be assessed what are the demands of the farmers and what will be the effect of these demonstrations on all areas.
The middle class thinks that if “the matter is in the court” then the situation remains the same. This is not a case like Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid in which common people can have a neutral view. This will affect every person in the middle class when and when he buys food and sits down to eat.
The only solution to this is – Agricultural Bills should be repealed and they should be prepared afresh with the advice of farmers.
Why is the government instead looking for new ways to discredit farmers? About 50 farmers who staged sit-ins have died, but why does the government not bother with this? These are the real questions that are destroying people’s perceptions towards the government and the ruling party. Their opinions are changing.
In a shocking development, YouTuber Praneeth Hanumanthu has become embroiled in controversy following his detention by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. Initially arrested for making offensive remarks during a podcast, Hanumanthu's predicament has escalated, resulting in further allegations under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act after he tested positive for cannabis consumption. The Context of the Detention The origins of Hanumanthu's difficulties can be linked to a podcast he hosted, which included a conversation that many considered highly unseemly. During this episode, he made inappropriate comments regarding the dynamics between a father and daughter, igniting outrage among viewers and critics alike. This incident quickly garnered the attention of both the public and law enforcement, prompting an investigation by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. The primary allegation centered around his remarks, which were deemed to have crossed the boundaries of acceptable discourse. This scenario raises broader inquiries about accountability and the duties of content creators, particularly in an era where online platforms can amplify messages to a large audience. As a public figure, Hanumanthu's statements carry substantial weight, and the backlash he has encountered signifies society's increasing intolerance towards harmful rhetoric. Charges Related to Substances Things took a turn for the worse for Hanumanthu when, following his arrest, authorities opted to perform a drug test. The results confirmed the presence of cannabis in his system, leading to additional allegations under the NDPS Act. This legislation is a strict law in India aimed at combating substance abuse and trafficking. By testing positive for drug use, Hanumanthu not only worsened his legal troubles but also further tarnished his reputation. The addition of drug-related charges initiates an important discourse about the effects of substance use among influencers and celebrities. Many young individuals look up to figures like Hanumanthu, and such disclosures can have significant consequences on their perceptions and behaviors. The fallout from his actions extends beyond legal issues; it also encompasses the ethical obligations that accompany public visibility. Reactions from the Public and Consequences The public’s reaction to Hanumanthu's arrest has been varied. Many viewers voiced their outrage over both his initial remarks and his later substance use. Social media has been inundated with discussions, memes, and criticisms, illustrating the swift spread of information and opinions in today’s digital environment. Critics contend that individuals like Hanumanthu should be held accountable for their influence, particularly when it concerns endorsing a healthy lifestyle and responsible behavior. On the other hand, some supporters have rallied behind him, advocating for the necessity of empathy and understanding. They highlight the pressures that accompany being a public figure, especially in a hyper-connected world where every action is scrutinized. This divide in public sentiment mirrors a broader societal conversation about celebrity culture, accountability, and the intricacies of mental health and substance use. The Wider Picture of Substance Abuse Hanumanthu's situation is also part of a larger discourse regarding drug abuse in India, especially among the youth. As discussions about mental health and substance use become more widespread, incidents like this underscore the pressing need for awareness and education about addiction and its root causes. The stigma surrounding drug use often hampers open dialogue about the topic, leaving many to endure in silence. Moreover, the legal implications of the NDPS Act spark questions about how society addresses drug-related offenses. While the act aims to deter substance abuse, critics argue that such laws can disproportionately impact certain demographics and do not tackle the underlying causes of addiction. Conversations around harm reduction, rehabilitation, and public health strategies are increasingly relevant within the framework of these laws. Prospects Ahead for Hanumanthu As Hanumanthu navigates the forthcoming legal hurdles, his future remains unpredictable. He faces possible legal repercussions for both his unsatisfactory comments and his substance use, which could greatly affect his career and personal life. The scenario serves as a cautionary example for content creators about the consequences of their expressions and actions, highlighting the need for thoughtful engagement with their audience.…
Nimrat Kaur is an Indian actress celebrated for her contributions to Hindi cinema and American…
Grey divorce refers to the increasing trend of couples aged 50 and older choosing to…
In 2024, YouTube sensation MrBeast, born Jimmy Donaldson, has captivated audiences worldwide not only through…
CarryMinati, also known as Ajey Nagar, has once again made waves in the Indian and…
A video featuring Akash Ambani and Isha Ambani, the famous twin children of India’s richest…