0
0
0
0
China's government was keen on the decision of the Indian government to end the special status of Kashmir. In the last four weeks, China has expressed its opposition through different statements.
On August 5, the Bharatiya Janata Party-led central government abolished Article 370 giving semi-autonomy to the then Jammu and Kashmir state.
After this, a law was passed and the state was divided into two union territories.
One of these union territories is Ladakh. China has control over a part of it and claims this entire area.
China Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Khwa Chunying used strong words about India’s decision.
He said, “China has always opposed the Indian takeover of China’s territory in the western sector of the China-India border. There has been no change in our strong and consistent position.”
Khwa Chunying went on to say, “By changing its law, India has recently continued to ignore China’s territorial sovereignty. This approach is not acceptable and will not materialize.”
Meanwhile, senior BJP leaders welcomed the move in India with nationalist statements. Some leaders expressed the hope that the part of the region which is under the control of China and Pakistan will also come to India.
These leaders included Aksai Chin, a region of Ladakh controlled by China, and Pakistan-administered Kashmir, which India calls “Pakistan-occupied Kashmir” or “PoK”.
India Today magazine quoted Union Minister and senior Bharatiya Janata Party leader Giriraj Singh as saying, 200 percent sure that PoK and Aksai Chin will also be reunited with the country very soon.
Regarding Ladakh, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said, “The Indian government’s declaration of making Ladakh (which includes China’s territory) a union territory has challenged China’s sovereignty and to maintain peace and stability in the border region.” Violated the agreement between the two countries. “
The Indian government’s declaration of making Ladakh (which includes China’s territory) a union territory has challenged China’s sovereignty and violated the agreement between the two countries to maintain peace and stability in the border region.
On the Kashmir issue, Khwa Chunying said that China’s position on the Kashmir issue is clear and uniform. Even internationally, it is agreed that the issue of Kashmir between India and Pakistan is pending from the past.
China has been saying that the Ladakh region, including Aksai Chin, is part of a border dispute that has not been decided yet.
At the moment, China incorporates Aksai Chin in its Xinjiang region and considers it extremely important. The reason is that through this, there can be movement of troops between Xinjiang and Tibet.
China does not recognize the Simla Agreement. This agreement was signed between the British administration of Tibet and India in the year 1914. In which Ladakh has been recognized as part of India.
China says that this treaty was not made with the then Chinese government and therefore it is invalid.
Wang Yi said that India’s move is not acceptable to China and this will not change China’s position in the sovereignty and administrative jurisdiction of the region.
The government-controlled newspaper Global Times wrote, “When India’s Home Minister Amit Shah loudly claims that India wants to rule the Xinjiang Weigar Autonomous Region of Northwest China, it shows a sense of hostility against China. “
Quoting Zhao Gancheng, a research fellow at the Shanghai Institute for International Studies, the Global Times wrote, “If India puts forward its irrational claims and provokes us with military action, China will come back strongly.
India’s foreign ministry has responded to China’s criticisms. The Ministry of External Affairs says, “The formation of the new Union Territory of Ladakh is an internal matter of India.”
India’s Home Minister Amit Shah said in Parliament, “The people of Ladakh have been demanding for a very long time, to give the region the status of Union Territory, now they will be able to fulfill their aspirations.”
India has also been saying that China’s claim on Aksai Chin is illegal and is a violation of the Simla Agreement.
This dispute is further complicated by China’s close ally and India’s rival Pakistan. Pakistan had handed over a part of Trans Karakoram to China in the year 1963. This area is close to Aksai Chin. India calls Pakistan’s move illegal.
Reiterating India’s position on the matter for a long time, Shah said in Parliament, “Kashmir is an inseparable part of India.
There is no doubt about it. When I speak of Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan Occupied Kashmir and Aksai Chin also come in it.
They are also following what China has said. On the request of Pakistan, there was a closed-door meeting of the UN Security Council. Pakistan has a dispute with India over Kashmir.
A few days before this meeting, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar visited Beijing. According to the Global Times, he had said using the compromised language, “Amending the Constitution of India will not create a new claim to sovereignty.
It will not change the Line of Control in the Kashmir region (on the Pakistan border) and China-India The control line at the border will not change. “
Pakistan has been trying to internationalize the Kashmir dispute for a long time. The United Nations meeting seems to be an effort in that direction. India opposes making this issue an international matter.
But opinion was divided in this meeting. According to reports, Russia supported India. At the same time, Britain supported China in the demand that a public statement is issued after the meeting.
Apart from China, the remaining four permanent members of the UN Security Council asked India and Pakistan to resolve their disputes in a two-way manner.
Eventually, this meeting ended without issuing any statement. However, China and Pakistan later issued statements on their behalf.
After this, India also issued a statement and said that the statements of China and Pakistan do not express the views of the Security Council.
No other member country has denied India’s statement. In later days, most countries asked India and Pakistan to resolve their differences in Kashmir in a two-way way.
Ajaz Yunus Patel is a cricketer born in Mumbai, India, on October 21, 1988. He…
Ajaz Patel, the skilled left-arm spinner from New Zealand, gained international attention in 2021 when…
Are you dealing with an unusual headache? It could be a cervical or cervicogenic headache.…
In a shocking development, YouTuber Praneeth Hanumanthu has become embroiled in controversy following his detention by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. Initially arrested for making offensive remarks during a podcast, Hanumanthu's predicament has escalated, resulting in further allegations under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act after he tested positive for cannabis consumption. The Context of the Detention The origins of Hanumanthu's difficulties can be linked to a podcast he hosted, which included a conversation that many considered highly unseemly. During this episode, he made inappropriate comments regarding the dynamics between a father and daughter, igniting outrage among viewers and critics alike. This incident quickly garnered the attention of both the public and law enforcement, prompting an investigation by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. The primary allegation centered around his remarks, which were deemed to have crossed the boundaries of acceptable discourse. This scenario raises broader inquiries about accountability and the duties of content creators, particularly in an era where online platforms can amplify messages to a large audience. As a public figure, Hanumanthu's statements carry substantial weight, and the backlash he has encountered signifies society's increasing intolerance towards harmful rhetoric. Charges Related to Substances Things took a turn for the worse for Hanumanthu when, following his arrest, authorities opted to perform a drug test. The results confirmed the presence of cannabis in his system, leading to additional allegations under the NDPS Act. This legislation is a strict law in India aimed at combating substance abuse and trafficking. By testing positive for drug use, Hanumanthu not only worsened his legal troubles but also further tarnished his reputation. The addition of drug-related charges initiates an important discourse about the effects of substance use among influencers and celebrities. Many young individuals look up to figures like Hanumanthu, and such disclosures can have significant consequences on their perceptions and behaviors. The fallout from his actions extends beyond legal issues; it also encompasses the ethical obligations that accompany public visibility. Reactions from the Public and Consequences The public’s reaction to Hanumanthu's arrest has been varied. Many viewers voiced their outrage over both his initial remarks and his later substance use. Social media has been inundated with discussions, memes, and criticisms, illustrating the swift spread of information and opinions in today’s digital environment. Critics contend that individuals like Hanumanthu should be held accountable for their influence, particularly when it concerns endorsing a healthy lifestyle and responsible behavior. On the other hand, some supporters have rallied behind him, advocating for the necessity of empathy and understanding. They highlight the pressures that accompany being a public figure, especially in a hyper-connected world where every action is scrutinized. This divide in public sentiment mirrors a broader societal conversation about celebrity culture, accountability, and the intricacies of mental health and substance use. The Wider Picture of Substance Abuse Hanumanthu's situation is also part of a larger discourse regarding drug abuse in India, especially among the youth. As discussions about mental health and substance use become more widespread, incidents like this underscore the pressing need for awareness and education about addiction and its root causes. The stigma surrounding drug use often hampers open dialogue about the topic, leaving many to endure in silence. Moreover, the legal implications of the NDPS Act spark questions about how society addresses drug-related offenses. While the act aims to deter substance abuse, critics argue that such laws can disproportionately impact certain demographics and do not tackle the underlying causes of addiction. Conversations around harm reduction, rehabilitation, and public health strategies are increasingly relevant within the framework of these laws. Prospects Ahead for Hanumanthu As Hanumanthu navigates the forthcoming legal hurdles, his future remains unpredictable. He faces possible legal repercussions for both his unsatisfactory comments and his substance use, which could greatly affect his career and personal life. The scenario serves as a cautionary example for content creators about the consequences of their expressions and actions, highlighting the need for thoughtful engagement with their audience.…
Nimrat Kaur is an Indian actress celebrated for her contributions to Hindi cinema and American…
Grey divorce refers to the increasing trend of couples aged 50 and older choosing to…