0
0
0
0
Mahatma Gandhi’s life was like an open book. Many things used to be done in it and many things were kept in the eyes of the people.
Therefore, it was not possible to do any work secretly or to do any work of Gandhi Ji by himself, without informing anyone.
According to Gandhiji’s policy, it was absolutely right. There were six fatal assaults on him. The first attack took place in 1934 in Pune.
When he was to go to a function, two vehicles arrived, almost identical in appearance. One had organizers and the other had Kasturba and Mahatma Gandhi to travel.
The organizer, who had come to pick up, his car got out and there was a railway gate in the middle. Mahatma Gandhi’s car stopped there.
Just then a blast occurred, the car that went ahead flew away. Mahatma Gandhi survived that attack because the train was delayed. It is a matter of the year 1934.
After his release from Aga Khan Palace in the year 1944, Gandhi stayed at Panchgani, where some people were protesting against him.
Gandhi tried to talk to them, explain to them, understand their displeasure as to why they were angry.
But none of them was willing to talk and in the end, a man ran away with a knife, he was caught.
It was only in 1944 that Panchgani, Gandhi, and Jinnah’s talks were to be held in Bombay.
And some people like the Muslim League and Hindu Mahasabha were annoyed that Gandhi and Jinnah had no meaning and should not meet.
There too, an attempt was made to attack Gandhi, he also failed.
In 1946, the tracks of the train with which Gandhi was traveling near Nerul were uprooted and the train overturned, the engine crashed somewhere.
It is clear that in the year 1948, there were two attacks. For the first time when Madanlal wanted to explode the bomb, he did not explode and people were caught.
The story of the sixth time is that Nathuram Godse opened fire on January 30, 1948, and Mahatma Gandhi lost his life. Two more attempts were made to kill Gandhi.
Both those efforts are very interesting, both of them took place in Champaran. In the year 1917, Mahatma Gandhi was in Motihari.
Irwin, the manager of the largest indigo mill in Motihari, called Gandhi for talks. Irwin was the leader of the managers of all Neel factories in Motihari.
He stood with a tray, Gandhi saw him with his head raised, and the ducks started crying and the whole thing opened up. This story is nowhere in the biography of Mahatma Gandhi.
The story which is considered to be the most authentic of Champaran is not in the book of Babu Rajendra Prasad, it is not mentioned in any other quotation.
But in public memory Duck, Mian Ansari is a very famous man.
There was no name of duck mian left, they were imprisoned, their lands were auctioned.
In 1957, Rajendra Prasad was the President, he had to go to Narkatiaganj via Motihari.
Also read: Farmers back again on Ghazipur Border after Rakesh Tikait breaks tear
In a shocking development, YouTuber Praneeth Hanumanthu has become embroiled in controversy following his detention by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. Initially arrested for making offensive remarks during a podcast, Hanumanthu's predicament has escalated, resulting in further allegations under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act after he tested positive for cannabis consumption. The Context of the Detention The origins of Hanumanthu's difficulties can be linked to a podcast he hosted, which included a conversation that many considered highly unseemly. During this episode, he made inappropriate comments regarding the dynamics between a father and daughter, igniting outrage among viewers and critics alike. This incident quickly garnered the attention of both the public and law enforcement, prompting an investigation by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. The primary allegation centered around his remarks, which were deemed to have crossed the boundaries of acceptable discourse. This scenario raises broader inquiries about accountability and the duties of content creators, particularly in an era where online platforms can amplify messages to a large audience. As a public figure, Hanumanthu's statements carry substantial weight, and the backlash he has encountered signifies society's increasing intolerance towards harmful rhetoric. Charges Related to Substances Things took a turn for the worse for Hanumanthu when, following his arrest, authorities opted to perform a drug test. The results confirmed the presence of cannabis in his system, leading to additional allegations under the NDPS Act. This legislation is a strict law in India aimed at combating substance abuse and trafficking. By testing positive for drug use, Hanumanthu not only worsened his legal troubles but also further tarnished his reputation. The addition of drug-related charges initiates an important discourse about the effects of substance use among influencers and celebrities. Many young individuals look up to figures like Hanumanthu, and such disclosures can have significant consequences on their perceptions and behaviors. The fallout from his actions extends beyond legal issues; it also encompasses the ethical obligations that accompany public visibility. Reactions from the Public and Consequences The public’s reaction to Hanumanthu's arrest has been varied. Many viewers voiced their outrage over both his initial remarks and his later substance use. Social media has been inundated with discussions, memes, and criticisms, illustrating the swift spread of information and opinions in today’s digital environment. Critics contend that individuals like Hanumanthu should be held accountable for their influence, particularly when it concerns endorsing a healthy lifestyle and responsible behavior. On the other hand, some supporters have rallied behind him, advocating for the necessity of empathy and understanding. They highlight the pressures that accompany being a public figure, especially in a hyper-connected world where every action is scrutinized. This divide in public sentiment mirrors a broader societal conversation about celebrity culture, accountability, and the intricacies of mental health and substance use. The Wider Picture of Substance Abuse Hanumanthu's situation is also part of a larger discourse regarding drug abuse in India, especially among the youth. As discussions about mental health and substance use become more widespread, incidents like this underscore the pressing need for awareness and education about addiction and its root causes. The stigma surrounding drug use often hampers open dialogue about the topic, leaving many to endure in silence. Moreover, the legal implications of the NDPS Act spark questions about how society addresses drug-related offenses. While the act aims to deter substance abuse, critics argue that such laws can disproportionately impact certain demographics and do not tackle the underlying causes of addiction. Conversations around harm reduction, rehabilitation, and public health strategies are increasingly relevant within the framework of these laws. Prospects Ahead for Hanumanthu As Hanumanthu navigates the forthcoming legal hurdles, his future remains unpredictable. He faces possible legal repercussions for both his unsatisfactory comments and his substance use, which could greatly affect his career and personal life. The scenario serves as a cautionary example for content creators about the consequences of their expressions and actions, highlighting the need for thoughtful engagement with their audience.…
Nimrat Kaur is an Indian actress celebrated for her contributions to Hindi cinema and American…
Grey divorce refers to the increasing trend of couples aged 50 and older choosing to…
In 2024, YouTube sensation MrBeast, born Jimmy Donaldson, has captivated audiences worldwide not only through…
CarryMinati, also known as Ajey Nagar, has once again made waves in the Indian and…
A video featuring Akash Ambani and Isha Ambani, the famous twin children of India’s richest…