0
0
0
0
This crown is given to the hosts because of the ICC rules, which says that if the match is also tie in super overs, then the team which is more bound in the innings is considered to be the winner.
Whatever happened in the history of the Cricket World Cup, he was seen on Sunday’s Lord’s ground in England. The England team, called the father of cricket, defeated New Zealand, for the first time, the title was named for the first time, and on the other hand, they did not even get the chance to win the same victory in any World Cup final match. After the match tie was super over and the scores of both teams were stuck in superhero even though the England team became the Super Champion.
This crown is given to the hosts because of the ICC rules, which says that if the match is also tie in super overs, then the team which is more bound in the innings is considered as the winner. According to this, England totaled 26 boundaries, including 24 fours and two sixes, in their 50 overs innings and super over. While New Zealand got only 17 boundaries in their innings including Super.
Understand the boundary of the whole mathematics
New Zealand captain Ken Williamson decided to bat first before winning the toss in the Lord’s ground and scored 241 runs in eight overs, playing 50 overs. New Zealand made 14 fours and two sixes in their innings. In this way, he scored 68 runs with boundaries. At the same time, only one boundary was seen from New Zealand’s side in Super Over when Jimmy Neesham hit six. That is, New Zealand put together a total of 17 (14 fours, 3 sixes) boundaries in their 50 overs innings and super. With the support of the boundary, New Zealand scored a total of 74 runs.
On the other hand, England’s batting style became the cause of their victory. England’s batsmen, who were chasing scores of 241 runs, scored a lot of boundaries in the runs. Thanks to the excellent batting of Jason Roy, Ben Stokes, Joss Butler and Bairstow, England totaled 22 boundaries and two sixes in 50 overs. While two fours, Ben Stokes and Joss Butler put on a super over. In this way, England put 26 boundaries (24 chops, 2 sixes) in their entire innings, including super over and raised 108 runs with their support.
That means, England’s batsmen scored 108 runs, while New Zealand’s team was able to make only 74 runs, that is, in terms of boundaries, the difference was 34 runs. However, the real reason for the win was the ICC’s rule which says that after the match tie in the super over, the same team is declared the winner, who has the highest boundaries in his innings. In this way, England managed to win the World Cup for the first time.
Ajaz Patel, the skilled left-arm spinner from New Zealand, gained international attention in 2021 when…
Are you dealing with an unusual headache? It could be a cervical or cervicogenic headache.…
In a shocking development, YouTuber Praneeth Hanumanthu has become embroiled in controversy following his detention by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. Initially arrested for making offensive remarks during a podcast, Hanumanthu's predicament has escalated, resulting in further allegations under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act after he tested positive for cannabis consumption. The Context of the Detention The origins of Hanumanthu's difficulties can be linked to a podcast he hosted, which included a conversation that many considered highly unseemly. During this episode, he made inappropriate comments regarding the dynamics between a father and daughter, igniting outrage among viewers and critics alike. This incident quickly garnered the attention of both the public and law enforcement, prompting an investigation by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. The primary allegation centered around his remarks, which were deemed to have crossed the boundaries of acceptable discourse. This scenario raises broader inquiries about accountability and the duties of content creators, particularly in an era where online platforms can amplify messages to a large audience. As a public figure, Hanumanthu's statements carry substantial weight, and the backlash he has encountered signifies society's increasing intolerance towards harmful rhetoric. Charges Related to Substances Things took a turn for the worse for Hanumanthu when, following his arrest, authorities opted to perform a drug test. The results confirmed the presence of cannabis in his system, leading to additional allegations under the NDPS Act. This legislation is a strict law in India aimed at combating substance abuse and trafficking. By testing positive for drug use, Hanumanthu not only worsened his legal troubles but also further tarnished his reputation. The addition of drug-related charges initiates an important discourse about the effects of substance use among influencers and celebrities. Many young individuals look up to figures like Hanumanthu, and such disclosures can have significant consequences on their perceptions and behaviors. The fallout from his actions extends beyond legal issues; it also encompasses the ethical obligations that accompany public visibility. Reactions from the Public and Consequences The public’s reaction to Hanumanthu's arrest has been varied. Many viewers voiced their outrage over both his initial remarks and his later substance use. Social media has been inundated with discussions, memes, and criticisms, illustrating the swift spread of information and opinions in today’s digital environment. Critics contend that individuals like Hanumanthu should be held accountable for their influence, particularly when it concerns endorsing a healthy lifestyle and responsible behavior. On the other hand, some supporters have rallied behind him, advocating for the necessity of empathy and understanding. They highlight the pressures that accompany being a public figure, especially in a hyper-connected world where every action is scrutinized. This divide in public sentiment mirrors a broader societal conversation about celebrity culture, accountability, and the intricacies of mental health and substance use. The Wider Picture of Substance Abuse Hanumanthu's situation is also part of a larger discourse regarding drug abuse in India, especially among the youth. As discussions about mental health and substance use become more widespread, incidents like this underscore the pressing need for awareness and education about addiction and its root causes. The stigma surrounding drug use often hampers open dialogue about the topic, leaving many to endure in silence. Moreover, the legal implications of the NDPS Act spark questions about how society addresses drug-related offenses. While the act aims to deter substance abuse, critics argue that such laws can disproportionately impact certain demographics and do not tackle the underlying causes of addiction. Conversations around harm reduction, rehabilitation, and public health strategies are increasingly relevant within the framework of these laws. Prospects Ahead for Hanumanthu As Hanumanthu navigates the forthcoming legal hurdles, his future remains unpredictable. He faces possible legal repercussions for both his unsatisfactory comments and his substance use, which could greatly affect his career and personal life. The scenario serves as a cautionary example for content creators about the consequences of their expressions and actions, highlighting the need for thoughtful engagement with their audience.…
Nimrat Kaur is an Indian actress celebrated for her contributions to Hindi cinema and American…
Grey divorce refers to the increasing trend of couples aged 50 and older choosing to…
In 2024, YouTube sensation MrBeast, born Jimmy Donaldson, has captivated audiences worldwide not only through…