0
0
0
0
A Delhi court on Wednesday, former Union Minister M.J. The decision in the criminal defamation case can be heard against Akbar’s female journalist Priya Ramani.
Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Ravindra Kumar Pandey will pronounce this decision in an open court in the presence of both parties.
After hearing the arguments of both sides on 10 February, the court adjourned the decision till 17 February “MJ Akbar“.
Ramani’s lawyer Rebecca John had demanded from the court that her client be acquitted in the case. At the same time, Akbar’s lawyer Geeta Luthra asserted that due to Ramani’s allegations, Akbar’s image has deteriorated.
Senior advocate Rebecca told the court that Ramani’s Twitter account had been deactivated and could be activated following the court’s instruction
Rebecca John also questioned that the complainant had not filed any application to restart her client’s Twitter account.
At the same time, senior lawyer Luthra had said that if Ramani had given a ‘defamatory statement’ after many years, it was his responsibility to prove the truth.
During the cross-examination, MJ Akbar questioned journalist Priya Ramani while destroying evidence by deleting his Twitter account in a defamation case which is a criminal act.
Priya Ramani had accused the then Minister of State of External Affairs, MJ Akbar of sexual misconduct, during the Me To campaign and she was the first woman to make such accusations.
As part of the #MeToo campaign, 20 women journalists accused Akbar of sexual harassment. These women alleged that while being editor of The Asian Age and other newspapers, Akbar sexually harassed them.
He resigned from the Union Cabinet on October 17, 2018, following these allegations against MJ Akbar.
Senior journalist Priya Ramani, who first accused Akbar, expressed happiness over his resignation.
Priya Ramani had tweeted, “Our allegations have been proved correct by Akbar’s resignation. We are now waiting for the day when we will get justice in the court.”
First, MJ Akbar‘s name was taken by Priya Ramani. He shared his firsthand experience of harassment at the office by retweeting an article he wrote for Vogue India magazine titled ‘To the Harvey Weinstein of the World’.
He alleged that Akbar had made obscene acts with her inside and outside the newsroom.
In the statement issued after the resignation, Akbar said that he would personally fight against the allegations. Simultaneously, Akbar filed a defamation case against Ramani.
Also read: Happy Birthday AB de Villiers The only player who is ‘half Indian’ according to fan following
Ajaz Patel, the skilled left-arm spinner from New Zealand, gained international attention in 2021 when…
Are you dealing with an unusual headache? It could be a cervical or cervicogenic headache.…
In a shocking development, YouTuber Praneeth Hanumanthu has become embroiled in controversy following his detention by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. Initially arrested for making offensive remarks during a podcast, Hanumanthu's predicament has escalated, resulting in further allegations under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act after he tested positive for cannabis consumption. The Context of the Detention The origins of Hanumanthu's difficulties can be linked to a podcast he hosted, which included a conversation that many considered highly unseemly. During this episode, he made inappropriate comments regarding the dynamics between a father and daughter, igniting outrage among viewers and critics alike. This incident quickly garnered the attention of both the public and law enforcement, prompting an investigation by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. The primary allegation centered around his remarks, which were deemed to have crossed the boundaries of acceptable discourse. This scenario raises broader inquiries about accountability and the duties of content creators, particularly in an era where online platforms can amplify messages to a large audience. As a public figure, Hanumanthu's statements carry substantial weight, and the backlash he has encountered signifies society's increasing intolerance towards harmful rhetoric. Charges Related to Substances Things took a turn for the worse for Hanumanthu when, following his arrest, authorities opted to perform a drug test. The results confirmed the presence of cannabis in his system, leading to additional allegations under the NDPS Act. This legislation is a strict law in India aimed at combating substance abuse and trafficking. By testing positive for drug use, Hanumanthu not only worsened his legal troubles but also further tarnished his reputation. The addition of drug-related charges initiates an important discourse about the effects of substance use among influencers and celebrities. Many young individuals look up to figures like Hanumanthu, and such disclosures can have significant consequences on their perceptions and behaviors. The fallout from his actions extends beyond legal issues; it also encompasses the ethical obligations that accompany public visibility. Reactions from the Public and Consequences The public’s reaction to Hanumanthu's arrest has been varied. Many viewers voiced their outrage over both his initial remarks and his later substance use. Social media has been inundated with discussions, memes, and criticisms, illustrating the swift spread of information and opinions in today’s digital environment. Critics contend that individuals like Hanumanthu should be held accountable for their influence, particularly when it concerns endorsing a healthy lifestyle and responsible behavior. On the other hand, some supporters have rallied behind him, advocating for the necessity of empathy and understanding. They highlight the pressures that accompany being a public figure, especially in a hyper-connected world where every action is scrutinized. This divide in public sentiment mirrors a broader societal conversation about celebrity culture, accountability, and the intricacies of mental health and substance use. The Wider Picture of Substance Abuse Hanumanthu's situation is also part of a larger discourse regarding drug abuse in India, especially among the youth. As discussions about mental health and substance use become more widespread, incidents like this underscore the pressing need for awareness and education about addiction and its root causes. The stigma surrounding drug use often hampers open dialogue about the topic, leaving many to endure in silence. Moreover, the legal implications of the NDPS Act spark questions about how society addresses drug-related offenses. While the act aims to deter substance abuse, critics argue that such laws can disproportionately impact certain demographics and do not tackle the underlying causes of addiction. Conversations around harm reduction, rehabilitation, and public health strategies are increasingly relevant within the framework of these laws. Prospects Ahead for Hanumanthu As Hanumanthu navigates the forthcoming legal hurdles, his future remains unpredictable. He faces possible legal repercussions for both his unsatisfactory comments and his substance use, which could greatly affect his career and personal life. The scenario serves as a cautionary example for content creators about the consequences of their expressions and actions, highlighting the need for thoughtful engagement with their audience.…
Nimrat Kaur is an Indian actress celebrated for her contributions to Hindi cinema and American…
Grey divorce refers to the increasing trend of couples aged 50 and older choosing to…
In 2024, YouTube sensation MrBeast, born Jimmy Donaldson, has captivated audiences worldwide not only through…