0
0
0
0
On Friday, the Delhi government has taken a major decision in the matter related to raising anti-national slogans in Jawaharlal Nehru University. The government has given permission to the Delhi Police to pursue a case of treason against ten other accused including Kanhaiya Kumar, former president of JNU Students Union. The case was pending with the Delhi government for 13 months.
The Special Cell of Delhi Police had investigated the case, but the Delhi government did not give permission on the file to file the chargesheet. After getting permission, Kanhaiya will be tried for treason.
Case filed in fast track court: Kanhaiya
Kanhaiya Kumar has also reacted after being cleared for the treason case. Speaking to news agency ANI, he said that it is clear that the case was made for political gain and it was delayed. I want a trial in a fast-track court so that the entire country knows how a law like treason is being misused. Kanhaiya Kumar said that when the charge sheet was filed for the first time when I was going to contest elections and now Bihar elections are going to be held again.
Anti-country slogans were chanted in JNU
On 9 February 2016, videos of anti-country slogans were revealed in JNU, after which the case was investigated. A case was then filed against Kanhaiya Kumar and others. On January 14, 2019, a chargesheet was filed in the court against 10 people including Kanhaiya Kumar, Umar Khalid, Anirban, Aqib Hussain, Mujib, Umar Gul, Basharat Ali and Khalid Basir in this case of JNU. But the Delhi government did not allow the case to be prosecuted under treason.
The Delhi government had said at the time that the Delhi Police had violated the rules. A charge sheet has been filed without permission from them. Later the Delhi government had said that a legal opinion was being taken in this matter. In the recently concluded Delhi Assembly elections, the BJP had thrown up the matter and tried to surround the Aam Aadmi Party. On which Chief Minister Kejriwal indicated early action in this matter.
Charge sheet was filed without approval from the government
The police got reprimanded many times even before the court for not getting the approval to prosecute Kanhaiya Kumar and others in the JNU sedition case. The police had filed a chargesheet in a court in Patiala House without obtaining approval from the government. Due to this, the court reprimanded the police.
The court has not yet taken cognizance of the chargesheet filed on January 14 last year, as the police were not getting clearance from the government. Repeated hearing on the chargesheet was deferred and every time the police used to have the same answer in the court that the sanction was not granted. The last hearing in this case was held on 19 February. The court had said that write a letter to the government again and take the report in the court by 3 April with the approval.
In a shocking development, YouTuber Praneeth Hanumanthu has become embroiled in controversy following his detention by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. Initially arrested for making offensive remarks during a podcast, Hanumanthu's predicament has escalated, resulting in further allegations under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act after he tested positive for cannabis consumption. The Context of the Detention The origins of Hanumanthu's difficulties can be linked to a podcast he hosted, which included a conversation that many considered highly unseemly. During this episode, he made inappropriate comments regarding the dynamics between a father and daughter, igniting outrage among viewers and critics alike. This incident quickly garnered the attention of both the public and law enforcement, prompting an investigation by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. The primary allegation centered around his remarks, which were deemed to have crossed the boundaries of acceptable discourse. This scenario raises broader inquiries about accountability and the duties of content creators, particularly in an era where online platforms can amplify messages to a large audience. As a public figure, Hanumanthu's statements carry substantial weight, and the backlash he has encountered signifies society's increasing intolerance towards harmful rhetoric. Charges Related to Substances Things took a turn for the worse for Hanumanthu when, following his arrest, authorities opted to perform a drug test. The results confirmed the presence of cannabis in his system, leading to additional allegations under the NDPS Act. This legislation is a strict law in India aimed at combating substance abuse and trafficking. By testing positive for drug use, Hanumanthu not only worsened his legal troubles but also further tarnished his reputation. The addition of drug-related charges initiates an important discourse about the effects of substance use among influencers and celebrities. Many young individuals look up to figures like Hanumanthu, and such disclosures can have significant consequences on their perceptions and behaviors. The fallout from his actions extends beyond legal issues; it also encompasses the ethical obligations that accompany public visibility. Reactions from the Public and Consequences The public’s reaction to Hanumanthu's arrest has been varied. Many viewers voiced their outrage over both his initial remarks and his later substance use. Social media has been inundated with discussions, memes, and criticisms, illustrating the swift spread of information and opinions in today’s digital environment. Critics contend that individuals like Hanumanthu should be held accountable for their influence, particularly when it concerns endorsing a healthy lifestyle and responsible behavior. On the other hand, some supporters have rallied behind him, advocating for the necessity of empathy and understanding. They highlight the pressures that accompany being a public figure, especially in a hyper-connected world where every action is scrutinized. This divide in public sentiment mirrors a broader societal conversation about celebrity culture, accountability, and the intricacies of mental health and substance use. The Wider Picture of Substance Abuse Hanumanthu's situation is also part of a larger discourse regarding drug abuse in India, especially among the youth. As discussions about mental health and substance use become more widespread, incidents like this underscore the pressing need for awareness and education about addiction and its root causes. The stigma surrounding drug use often hampers open dialogue about the topic, leaving many to endure in silence. Moreover, the legal implications of the NDPS Act spark questions about how society addresses drug-related offenses. While the act aims to deter substance abuse, critics argue that such laws can disproportionately impact certain demographics and do not tackle the underlying causes of addiction. Conversations around harm reduction, rehabilitation, and public health strategies are increasingly relevant within the framework of these laws. Prospects Ahead for Hanumanthu As Hanumanthu navigates the forthcoming legal hurdles, his future remains unpredictable. He faces possible legal repercussions for both his unsatisfactory comments and his substance use, which could greatly affect his career and personal life. The scenario serves as a cautionary example for content creators about the consequences of their expressions and actions, highlighting the need for thoughtful engagement with their audience.…
Nimrat Kaur is an Indian actress celebrated for her contributions to Hindi cinema and American…
Grey divorce refers to the increasing trend of couples aged 50 and older choosing to…
In 2024, YouTube sensation MrBeast, born Jimmy Donaldson, has captivated audiences worldwide not only through…
CarryMinati, also known as Ajey Nagar, has once again made waves in the Indian and…
A video featuring Akash Ambani and Isha Ambani, the famous twin children of India’s richest…