0
0
0
0
In the midst of the ongoing debate over vaccine export, the Serum Institute has released the statement of Adar Poonawala.
Adar Poonawala, the head of Serum Institute of India, the largest vaccine-making company in India, has issued a statement saying that it will take 2-3 years to fully vaccinate the entire population of the world. Apart from this, Poonawala said that a country with a large population like India cannot be given a vaccine in two or three months. Amid the ongoing debate over vaccine exports, he said- ‘SII never exported vaccines at the cost of the people of India’.
In the midst of the ongoing debate over vaccine export, the Serum Institute has issued the statement of Adar Poonawala.
We are among the 2 most populous countries in the world, so the vaccination campaign for such a large population cannot be completed in 2-3 months. Because there are many challenges. It will take 2-3 years for the entire world population to be fully vaccinated. We cannot export vaccine at the cost of the people of India.
— Adar Poonawala, CEO Serum Institute
Poonawala said in a statement- ‘When the vaccine was launched in January, there was a large stock of vaccines in India. Then the corona virus case was at its lowest level and the vaccination campaign had started. But at the same time, many other countries were facing serious crisis and they needed help. Then India helped the needy countries and now India is getting help from those countries.
Adar Poonawala said- ‘We have made some alliances with the world, which we have promised to COVAX. So that they too can distribute the vaccine in the world and eliminate the corona crisis from the world. We will continue to work on increasing vaccine production.
On May 14, BJP spokesperson Sambit Patra said that more than 5 crore vaccines were sent not out as a help but under the contract rules of the serum company. But the Union Health Minister shared a screenshot of a blog saying that, despite the lack of vaccine in the country, we sent around 66 million vaccine doses worldwide on the basis of humanity.
In such a situation, the question is that when other countries of the world were busy preparing the vaccine stock for themselves, why did India not show such strictness on the serum as it is shown today. Apart from this, why did the government not help the serum to speed up vaccine production so that the vaccine can also be exported under the serum agreement and India’s needs can also be fulfilled.
Ajaz Yunus Patel is a cricketer born in Mumbai, India, on October 21, 1988. He…
Ajaz Patel, the skilled left-arm spinner from New Zealand, gained international attention in 2021 when…
Are you dealing with an unusual headache? It could be a cervical or cervicogenic headache.…
In a shocking development, YouTuber Praneeth Hanumanthu has become embroiled in controversy following his detention by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. Initially arrested for making offensive remarks during a podcast, Hanumanthu's predicament has escalated, resulting in further allegations under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act after he tested positive for cannabis consumption. The Context of the Detention The origins of Hanumanthu's difficulties can be linked to a podcast he hosted, which included a conversation that many considered highly unseemly. During this episode, he made inappropriate comments regarding the dynamics between a father and daughter, igniting outrage among viewers and critics alike. This incident quickly garnered the attention of both the public and law enforcement, prompting an investigation by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. The primary allegation centered around his remarks, which were deemed to have crossed the boundaries of acceptable discourse. This scenario raises broader inquiries about accountability and the duties of content creators, particularly in an era where online platforms can amplify messages to a large audience. As a public figure, Hanumanthu's statements carry substantial weight, and the backlash he has encountered signifies society's increasing intolerance towards harmful rhetoric. Charges Related to Substances Things took a turn for the worse for Hanumanthu when, following his arrest, authorities opted to perform a drug test. The results confirmed the presence of cannabis in his system, leading to additional allegations under the NDPS Act. This legislation is a strict law in India aimed at combating substance abuse and trafficking. By testing positive for drug use, Hanumanthu not only worsened his legal troubles but also further tarnished his reputation. The addition of drug-related charges initiates an important discourse about the effects of substance use among influencers and celebrities. Many young individuals look up to figures like Hanumanthu, and such disclosures can have significant consequences on their perceptions and behaviors. The fallout from his actions extends beyond legal issues; it also encompasses the ethical obligations that accompany public visibility. Reactions from the Public and Consequences The public’s reaction to Hanumanthu's arrest has been varied. Many viewers voiced their outrage over both his initial remarks and his later substance use. Social media has been inundated with discussions, memes, and criticisms, illustrating the swift spread of information and opinions in today’s digital environment. Critics contend that individuals like Hanumanthu should be held accountable for their influence, particularly when it concerns endorsing a healthy lifestyle and responsible behavior. On the other hand, some supporters have rallied behind him, advocating for the necessity of empathy and understanding. They highlight the pressures that accompany being a public figure, especially in a hyper-connected world where every action is scrutinized. This divide in public sentiment mirrors a broader societal conversation about celebrity culture, accountability, and the intricacies of mental health and substance use. The Wider Picture of Substance Abuse Hanumanthu's situation is also part of a larger discourse regarding drug abuse in India, especially among the youth. As discussions about mental health and substance use become more widespread, incidents like this underscore the pressing need for awareness and education about addiction and its root causes. The stigma surrounding drug use often hampers open dialogue about the topic, leaving many to endure in silence. Moreover, the legal implications of the NDPS Act spark questions about how society addresses drug-related offenses. While the act aims to deter substance abuse, critics argue that such laws can disproportionately impact certain demographics and do not tackle the underlying causes of addiction. Conversations around harm reduction, rehabilitation, and public health strategies are increasingly relevant within the framework of these laws. Prospects Ahead for Hanumanthu As Hanumanthu navigates the forthcoming legal hurdles, his future remains unpredictable. He faces possible legal repercussions for both his unsatisfactory comments and his substance use, which could greatly affect his career and personal life. The scenario serves as a cautionary example for content creators about the consequences of their expressions and actions, highlighting the need for thoughtful engagement with their audience.…
Nimrat Kaur is an Indian actress celebrated for her contributions to Hindi cinema and American…
Grey divorce refers to the increasing trend of couples aged 50 and older choosing to…