0 0
If covid patient not treated , can prosecute the government? – News in Headlines
India

If covid patient not treated , can prosecute the government?

Read Time:6 Minute, 5 Second

The failure is clear and can be proved by statistics, can the government be held accountable?

In Delhi, the 30-year-old Naveen was gasping due to a decreased oxygen label (SpO2) when he was allegedly denied a bed at the Government Rao Tula Ram Memorial Hospital. Despite having such a low SpO2 label, the examining doctor did not admit Naveen to the hospital.

Even though Naveen’s family kept on begging for help like crazy, the hospital did not arrange an ambulance to transfer him to another hospital. After 1 hour Naveen succumbed to decreasing oxygen.

According to Naveen’s family, he became a ‘victim of neglect of fundamental rights by the government’. He has approached the Delhi High Court to determine the accountability of the government through compensation.

Naveen was among the thousands of people in the country whose death was not just due to the virus but due to the absence of medical treatment at the right time.

On April 24, 25 people died due to lack of oxygen at Jaipur Golden Hospital in Delhi. Just 6 days later, 7 people died due to lack of medical facilities in a hospital in Gurugram.

Medical Director of Jaipur Golden Hospital, Dr. DK Balooja told NDTV that he had been allocated 3.5 metric tonnes of oxygen by the government and should have reached it by 5 pm, but he arrived at midnight.

It is the constitutional duty of the state to protect the fundamental right of its people to live. The absence or absence of medical infrastructure shows that the state has failed to fulfill its duty. Since this failure is clear and which can be proved by the data, can we hold the government accountable? Is the government criminally responsible for this misery?

Have the authorities been negligent?

High courts across the country have slammed the Election Commission like the Central Government, the State Government and the Constitutional Authority for failing in their duties.

On Friday, May 7, the Delhi High Court said that the medical infrastructure in Delhi is in a shambles and the state government cannot behave like an ‘ostrich in the sand’. A month ago, the court said that despite getting funds for the oxygen plant in December 2020, the Delhi government failed to set up it.

Government authorities have also got data for their sheer negligence. While the Madras and Allahabad High Courts have heard the Election Commission for election mismanagement, on the other hand, the Jharkhand High Court has issued a show cause notice to the drug controllers for failing to stop the black marketing of essential medicines and oxygen.

Various courts have found that governments have failed to protect the fundamental right to life enjoyed by the people of India under Article 21 of the Constitution. He has been proven to retract from his responsibility and he has also been criticized, but the situation on the ground is still terrible. People are also struggling for basic medical needs to survive from Covid-19.

What after this criminal negligence?

Section 304A defines criminal negligence within the Indian Penal Code. Under this section, a person convicted can be punished with imprisonment for 2 years or fine or both.

The basis for proving the guilt of criminal negligence is:

  • The accused should have ‘duty of care’ towards the victim.
  • The accused has failed in that duty.
  • The accused has failed to perform the duty that was expected of him or should have done what he should not have done.
  • Due to the negligence of the accused, the victim has to be genuine and concrete.

Although the ‘right to health’ is clearly not a part of the fundamental rights received under the Constitution, the Supreme Court in its various judgments has interpreted that it is a part of the ‘right to life’ obtained under Article 21.

Amala Dasarthi, who is practicing in Delhi, is helping people to reach the medical system in this crisis. He believes that a clear connection can be drawn between the government’s forecast of this current crisis and the refusal to act on it and the deaths due to non-availability of lifesaving medical facilities across the country.

“The Covid-19 crisis was recognized as a global health emergency and last year saw a nationwide lockdown for almost 2 months. When India knew that its investment in health care facilities was so low, it would ask the government It is practical to expect that it would invest to increase its health care capacity in the last 1 year to fight this Covid-19 crisis. It is also practical to expect the government to make a strong effort to handle the current crisis and ensure that To provide a system for citizens to have access to life saving healthcare. “
– Amala Dasrathi

Therefore, despite the clear warning that the government is unable to guess the second wave, at first sight it seems negligent in its duty to protect the ‘right to health’ and ‘right to life’ of the citizens.

The lack of this forecast is consistent with the extent of criminal negligence in the government’s complacency and ruthlessness amidst rising cases and deaths. The election rally continued in full swing and religious crowds were allowed to gather. The event proved to be a super spreader of the virus.

Naveen’s case, litmus test

Kumbh Mela, election rallies, panchayat elections – in these events, there is major evidence to run a case of criminal negligence on the central government and the state governments.

This is criminal negligence as the authorities not only made predictions but acted against public health on all parameters. When the second wave was spreading, the Prime Minister and Home Minister were addressing election rallies in West Bengal. Criminal negligence will probably be the shortest punishment for such apparent neglect of the protection of the lives of people from the virus.

On May 4, the Delhi High Court sent a notice to the Delhi government in a petition filed by Naveen’s family for compensation. How the court handles the case, what is its opinion and its final decision is the accountability of the governments and authorities (which I I understand criminal negligence) can prove to be a milestone in deciding.

Given the power of the government and the risks associated with criminal justice, it would be a mountainous task for the aggrieved family to prove the government guilty for its negligence. Nevertheless, his petition for compensation will be more acceptable to the court.

The Supreme Court, while hearing the Covid Crisis in the Self-Cognition Case, had advised the Central Government to formulate a nationwide policy of compensation for the people who died due to lack of medical facilities. The Supreme Court said that the government has such power under the National Disaster Management Act.

Instead of fixing the criminal negligence of the government, this situation of compensation seems more punishable for not protecting the fundamental right of the people.

There is still no countrywide policy on compensation for ‘victims of the system’. So Naveen’s family was forced to go to court. Time will tell whether the victim families will get compensation for their rights or not, but if the failure of those who have failed to fulfill their duties is proved, then it will be a step towards justice.

 

Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %
Divya Sharma

Editor in Chief with Newsinheadlines, Author, Cover Story around Business and Entrepreneurship.

Recent Posts

Who Is Ajaz Patel’s Wife? Discover Everything About Nilofer Patel

Ajaz Patel, the skilled left-arm spinner from New Zealand, gained international attention in 2021 when…

22 hours ago

What Makes Physiotherapy the Best Solution for Cervicogenic Headache?

Are you dealing with an unusual headache? It could be a cervical or cervicogenic headache.…

23 hours ago

YouTuber Praneeth Hanumanthu: Navigating Controversy and Consequences

In a shocking development, YouTuber Praneeth Hanumanthu has become embroiled in controversy following his detention by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. Initially arrested for making offensive remarks during a podcast, Hanumanthu's predicament has escalated, resulting in further allegations under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act after he tested positive for cannabis consumption. The Context of the Detention The origins of Hanumanthu's difficulties can be linked to a podcast he hosted, which included a conversation that many considered highly unseemly. During this episode, he made inappropriate comments regarding the dynamics between a father and daughter, igniting outrage among viewers and critics alike. This incident quickly garnered the attention of both the public and law enforcement, prompting an investigation by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. The primary allegation centered around his remarks, which were deemed to have crossed the boundaries of acceptable discourse. This scenario raises broader inquiries about accountability and the duties of content creators, particularly in an era where online platforms can amplify messages to a large audience. As a public figure, Hanumanthu's statements carry substantial weight, and the backlash he has encountered signifies society's increasing intolerance towards harmful rhetoric. Charges Related to Substances Things took a turn for the worse for Hanumanthu when, following his arrest, authorities opted to perform a drug test. The results confirmed the presence of cannabis in his system, leading to additional allegations under the NDPS Act. This legislation is a strict law in India aimed at combating substance abuse and trafficking. By testing positive for drug use, Hanumanthu not only worsened his legal troubles but also further tarnished his reputation. The addition of drug-related charges initiates an important discourse about the effects of substance use among influencers and celebrities. Many young individuals look up to figures like Hanumanthu, and such disclosures can have significant consequences on their perceptions and behaviors. The fallout from his actions extends beyond legal issues; it also encompasses the ethical obligations that accompany public visibility. Reactions from the Public and Consequences The public’s reaction to Hanumanthu's arrest has been varied. Many viewers voiced their outrage over both his initial remarks and his later substance use. Social media has been inundated with discussions, memes, and criticisms, illustrating the swift spread of information and opinions in today’s digital environment. Critics contend that individuals like Hanumanthu should be held accountable for their influence, particularly when it concerns endorsing a healthy lifestyle and responsible behavior. On the other hand, some supporters have rallied behind him, advocating for the necessity of empathy and understanding. They highlight the pressures that accompany being a public figure, especially in a hyper-connected world where every action is scrutinized. This divide in public sentiment mirrors a broader societal conversation about celebrity culture, accountability, and the intricacies of mental health and substance use. The Wider Picture of Substance Abuse Hanumanthu's situation is also part of a larger discourse regarding drug abuse in India, especially among the youth. As discussions about mental health and substance use become more widespread, incidents like this underscore the pressing need for awareness and education about addiction and its root causes. The stigma surrounding drug use often hampers open dialogue about the topic, leaving many to endure in silence. Moreover, the legal implications of the NDPS Act spark questions about how society addresses drug-related offenses. While the act aims to deter substance abuse, critics argue that such laws can disproportionately impact certain demographics and do not tackle the underlying causes of addiction. Conversations around harm reduction, rehabilitation, and public health strategies are increasingly relevant within the framework of these laws. Prospects Ahead for Hanumanthu As Hanumanthu navigates the forthcoming legal hurdles, his future remains unpredictable. He faces possible legal repercussions for both his unsatisfactory comments and his substance use, which could greatly affect his career and personal life. The scenario serves as a cautionary example for content creators about the consequences of their expressions and actions, highlighting the need for thoughtful engagement with their audience.…

7 days ago

Nimrat Kaur: A Journey Through Indian Cinema and International Television

Nimrat Kaur is an Indian actress celebrated for her contributions to Hindi cinema and American…

1 week ago

what is grey divorce mean | A Changing Landscape in India

Grey divorce refers to the increasing trend of couples aged 50 and older choosing to…

1 week ago

MrBeast Net Worth in 2024: The Man Behind the $700 Million Fortune

In 2024, YouTube sensation MrBeast, born Jimmy Donaldson, has captivated audiences worldwide not only through…

2 weeks ago