0 0
HC order could dilute Centre’s GST anti-profiteering efforts – News in Headlines
Categories: Other

HC order could dilute Centre’s GST anti-profiteering efforts

Read Time:2 Minute, 6 Second

A decision taken by the Delhi High Court recently has the potential to undo the government’s steps to provide the GST Anti-Profiteering Authority with greater powers to ensure no profiteering occurs.

The High Court has provided relief to Reckitt Benckiser India Private Limited by ordering an interim stay on the notice issued by the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) seeking information on all products of the company, whereas the National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) had ordered an inquiry for only one product.

Earlier this month, the government had provided the DGAP with precisely this power, to assess products that are currently not part of its investigation.

“It is pointed out by Mr. P. Chidambaram, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, that the National Anti- Profiteering Authority has ordered an inquiry as regards one of the products of the petitioner i.e. Dettol HW Liquid Original 900 ml (complained product).

“The grievance of the petitioner is that the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) has by the impugned notice dated 8th/9th April, 2019 sought information on all products of the petitioner,” the order said.

“The court is of the view that the petitioner has made out a prima facie case for grant of limited interim relief.

It is directed that, till the next date, it will not be required to furnish information to the DGAP pursuant to the impugned notice other than information pertaining to the complained product,” the order added.

The court, however, clarified the NAA’s inquiry as far as the complained product is concerned would proceed in accordance with the law.

The government had, in early July, notified the changes in the rules of the NAA that allowed the NAA to direct the DGAP to further a probe, in case there was a reason to believe that there was a contravention in the rules, into goods and services not covered in the DGAP’s report.

“As a matter of practice, anti-profiteering investigations have been extended to products and services of a company, which were not a subject matter of the complaint,” Pratik Jain, partner and leader indirect tax, PwC India said, “This not only means additional paper work, collation of data etc. but also results in delay in completion of the investigation. If this principle [of only looking into the complained product] is finally upheld by courts, it would provide the much needed relief to industry, which has been requesting the government for issuance of definitive guidelines with respect to anti-profiteering proceedings

Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %
Rajveer Sekhawat

Recent Posts

Gwyneth Paltrow Biography | Age, Relationships, Career

Gwyneth Paltrow is an American actress and lifestyle entrepreneur, widely recognized for her portrayals of…

1 day ago

Jake Paul and Mike Tyson officially banned from boxing after controversial fight

Jake Paul and Mike Tyson have both been handed 24-day suspensions by the Texas Department…

1 day ago

Ross and Sacha’s Shocking Breakup After MAFS UK 2024: Sacha Opens Up About Their Relationship

One of the most shocking revelations from Married at First Sight UK 2024, aside from…

2 days ago

Bomb Cyclone Sweeps Through the Northwest US, Causing Widespread Damage

A powerful storm system struck the northwest US on Tuesday evening, bringing widespread power outages,…

3 days ago

Knox Jolie-Pitt’s striking Resemblance to Dad Brad Pitt Steals the Spotlight

Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie's highly publicized and tumultuous relationship continues to make headlines, even…

5 days ago

Family Searches for Missing Hannah Kobayashi Last Seen at LAX and The Grove

The family of Hannah Kobayashi, a 30-year-old woman from Maui, Hawaii, is desperately seeking answers…

5 days ago