In response to this goal, hosts England were all out for 197 runs in 91.3 overs and thus Australia won the fourth Test match by 185 runs.
Australia bowled out for 185 on Sunday, on the fifth and final day of the fourth Test match of the Ashes series played at Old Trafford ground in Manchester, on the back of their bowlers’ superb performance led by fast bowler Pat Cummins (four wickets for 43 runs). After retaining the Ashes, they retained their hold on the Ashes. Australia had won the Ashes series last time and this time too, they have now taken a 2–1 lead. After this victory, the Ashes will now remain intact with Australia. If the England team now wins the fifth and final Test match, then it can only equal the series 2-2, but it cannot take away the Ashes from Australia.
Australia had declared their first innings by scoring 497 runs for eight wickets and then they were all out for 301 in their first innings to take a lead of 196 runs. Australia declared 186 runs for six wickets in their second innings and set a target of 383 runs for victory in front of England.
In response to this goal, hosts England were all out for 197 runs in 91.3 overs and thus Australia won the fourth Test match by 185 runs. England started playing at 166 for six after tea. The hosts lost their most valuable wicket as Butler. Butler was bowled by Josh Hazlewood. Butler scored 111 off 111 balls with the help of four fours. Butler’s wicket fell to a score of 172.
After Butler was dismissed, the hosts scored eighth as Jofra Archer (1) at 173, ninth as Jack Leach (12) at 196, and Craig Overton (21) as 197. Lost 10th wicket. In his second innings for hosts England, Joe Denley scored the highest 53 runs. Apart from him, Jason Roy contributed 31 runs, Johnny Bairstow 25 and Ben Stokes and Joffra Archer contributed one run each. Opener Rory Burns and captain Joe Root were dismissed without opening an account.
For Australia, Pat Cummins took four wickets in the second innings, Nathan Lyon and Josh Hazlewood took two each, while Mitchell Starc and Marnus Labuschen took one wicket each. Australian batsman Steven Smith, who scored a double century in the first innings of the match, received the Man of the Match award for his brilliant innings.
Ajaz Yunus Patel is a cricketer born in Mumbai, India, on October 21, 1988. He…
Ajaz Patel, the skilled left-arm spinner from New Zealand, gained international attention in 2021 when…
Are you dealing with an unusual headache? It could be a cervical or cervicogenic headache.…
In a shocking development, YouTuber Praneeth Hanumanthu has become embroiled in controversy following his detention by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. Initially arrested for making offensive remarks during a podcast, Hanumanthu's predicament has escalated, resulting in further allegations under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act after he tested positive for cannabis consumption. The Context of the Detention The origins of Hanumanthu's difficulties can be linked to a podcast he hosted, which included a conversation that many considered highly unseemly. During this episode, he made inappropriate comments regarding the dynamics between a father and daughter, igniting outrage among viewers and critics alike. This incident quickly garnered the attention of both the public and law enforcement, prompting an investigation by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. The primary allegation centered around his remarks, which were deemed to have crossed the boundaries of acceptable discourse. This scenario raises broader inquiries about accountability and the duties of content creators, particularly in an era where online platforms can amplify messages to a large audience. As a public figure, Hanumanthu's statements carry substantial weight, and the backlash he has encountered signifies society's increasing intolerance towards harmful rhetoric. Charges Related to Substances Things took a turn for the worse for Hanumanthu when, following his arrest, authorities opted to perform a drug test. The results confirmed the presence of cannabis in his system, leading to additional allegations under the NDPS Act. This legislation is a strict law in India aimed at combating substance abuse and trafficking. By testing positive for drug use, Hanumanthu not only worsened his legal troubles but also further tarnished his reputation. The addition of drug-related charges initiates an important discourse about the effects of substance use among influencers and celebrities. Many young individuals look up to figures like Hanumanthu, and such disclosures can have significant consequences on their perceptions and behaviors. The fallout from his actions extends beyond legal issues; it also encompasses the ethical obligations that accompany public visibility. Reactions from the Public and Consequences The public’s reaction to Hanumanthu's arrest has been varied. Many viewers voiced their outrage over both his initial remarks and his later substance use. Social media has been inundated with discussions, memes, and criticisms, illustrating the swift spread of information and opinions in today’s digital environment. Critics contend that individuals like Hanumanthu should be held accountable for their influence, particularly when it concerns endorsing a healthy lifestyle and responsible behavior. On the other hand, some supporters have rallied behind him, advocating for the necessity of empathy and understanding. They highlight the pressures that accompany being a public figure, especially in a hyper-connected world where every action is scrutinized. This divide in public sentiment mirrors a broader societal conversation about celebrity culture, accountability, and the intricacies of mental health and substance use. The Wider Picture of Substance Abuse Hanumanthu's situation is also part of a larger discourse regarding drug abuse in India, especially among the youth. As discussions about mental health and substance use become more widespread, incidents like this underscore the pressing need for awareness and education about addiction and its root causes. The stigma surrounding drug use often hampers open dialogue about the topic, leaving many to endure in silence. Moreover, the legal implications of the NDPS Act spark questions about how society addresses drug-related offenses. While the act aims to deter substance abuse, critics argue that such laws can disproportionately impact certain demographics and do not tackle the underlying causes of addiction. Conversations around harm reduction, rehabilitation, and public health strategies are increasingly relevant within the framework of these laws. Prospects Ahead for Hanumanthu As Hanumanthu navigates the forthcoming legal hurdles, his future remains unpredictable. He faces possible legal repercussions for both his unsatisfactory comments and his substance use, which could greatly affect his career and personal life. The scenario serves as a cautionary example for content creators about the consequences of their expressions and actions, highlighting the need for thoughtful engagement with their audience.…
Nimrat Kaur is an Indian actress celebrated for her contributions to Hindi cinema and American…
Grey divorce refers to the increasing trend of couples aged 50 and older choosing to…