It has been more than three years since GST (Goods and Services Tax) came into force. One Nation, One Tax GST these days, the corona is under the grip of both the Center and the state. So far, 41 meetings have been held on GST and hundreds of amendments have been made in the GST law, but it remains a challenge to completely derail it. The possibility of a rar in the government and the opposition in the coming days about GST is clearly visible. It is worth noting that last month, on August 27, the 41st meeting of the GST Council was held, in which there was a discussion on the revision of new GST rates on several products, including the issue of GST compensation to the states. Although the 42nd meeting was to be held on 19 September, Which will now be on October 5. This has happened due to the monsoon session. Due to Kovid-19, GST collections have suffered a lot in the current financial year. It is evident that the problems of the already troubled center have increased further in the case of compensation to the states.
On July 1, 2017, the GST came with the promise that it would do the work to bridge the deficit of the states by 2022. These days the Center and states are on the backfoot in financial matters and the GST collection has gone down to a comparatively low level. In view of this, the central government has placed two options before the states, in which one can take loans equal to the RBI’s compensation on easy terms, while in the second option, states can take the full amount of GST dues i.e. Rs 2.35 lakh crore from the market. States that do not go to these options may have to wait until June 2022 to compensate.
Obviously, both these conditions are not less than a challenge before the states. The Central Government will never think that any such phase of God of Act will come, when it will not live up to its three year old promise. At present, 21 states have chosen the former option on the issue of GST compensation. All states will jointly take loans from RBI of about 97 thousand crores. Which includes non-BJP ruled states Andhra Pradesh and Odisha apart from BJP ruled states, but Jharkhand, Kerala, Maharashtra, Delhi, Punjab, Bengal, Telangana and Tamil Nadu and Rajasthan have not yet asked the Center what they will do.
It is obvious that a new type of financial crisis will not only arise in front of these states, but their development work will also be affected due to lack of money from the Center for a long time. Part-12 of the Indian Constitution discusses the financial relations of the center-state and there have been disputes between the two. If we understand the parameters of GST more deeply, the government had targeted to raise Rs 13 lakh crore in a year, which has never been completed in three years. This happened only once in the year 2017-18 when the GST collection crossed Rs 1 lakh crore. This happened four times in the financial year 2018-19 and five times more than one lakh crore rupees was collected in 2019-2020. Now the financial year 2020-21 is in the grip of Corona and the figures of GST collections have fallen on the ground. From this, it can be estimated how the situation has deteriorated in the case of indirect tax.
GST is one of his ambitious plans for Prime Minister Modi, but the growth rate these days is getting the best from agriculture and the country’s growth rate has fallen to a negative 23. The dilemma is how will problems be solved in the absence of money? It is possible that income tax may also fall in the coming days. The government is yet to see a specific agenda to increase tax collection. This may also be due to increased unemployment from the corona. Years ago, in the matter of increasing tax collection, the government used to find new avenues, but now in the event of not being able to compensate the states, it is suggesting the path of debt. Initially the government created four categories of GST payers, who were identified as indifferent, obstructive, enterprising and supportive.
Looking at the current situation, it seems that the tax payers are not indifferent, but have been caught in the corona blockage. The philosopher of England, Jeremy Bentham, gave the Strick and Caret theory, in which one means the strict way and the other calls for it. Given the way Corona has destroyed development, decimated income, destroyed businesses, increased unemployment, the government has neither been able to take very strict steps to increase tax collections nor has much appeal. Has been Can say that she is trying to overcome the problem, but it is difficult to tell when the Uberi will come and when the Corona will go, there is no idea. Right now the central and state governments are struggling with financial difficulties, but between these two the citizens of the country are also suffering.
Ajaz Yunus Patel is a cricketer born in Mumbai, India, on October 21, 1988. He…
Ajaz Patel, the skilled left-arm spinner from New Zealand, gained international attention in 2021 when…
Are you dealing with an unusual headache? It could be a cervical or cervicogenic headache.…
In a shocking development, YouTuber Praneeth Hanumanthu has become embroiled in controversy following his detention by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. Initially arrested for making offensive remarks during a podcast, Hanumanthu's predicament has escalated, resulting in further allegations under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act after he tested positive for cannabis consumption. The Context of the Detention The origins of Hanumanthu's difficulties can be linked to a podcast he hosted, which included a conversation that many considered highly unseemly. During this episode, he made inappropriate comments regarding the dynamics between a father and daughter, igniting outrage among viewers and critics alike. This incident quickly garnered the attention of both the public and law enforcement, prompting an investigation by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. The primary allegation centered around his remarks, which were deemed to have crossed the boundaries of acceptable discourse. This scenario raises broader inquiries about accountability and the duties of content creators, particularly in an era where online platforms can amplify messages to a large audience. As a public figure, Hanumanthu's statements carry substantial weight, and the backlash he has encountered signifies society's increasing intolerance towards harmful rhetoric. Charges Related to Substances Things took a turn for the worse for Hanumanthu when, following his arrest, authorities opted to perform a drug test. The results confirmed the presence of cannabis in his system, leading to additional allegations under the NDPS Act. This legislation is a strict law in India aimed at combating substance abuse and trafficking. By testing positive for drug use, Hanumanthu not only worsened his legal troubles but also further tarnished his reputation. The addition of drug-related charges initiates an important discourse about the effects of substance use among influencers and celebrities. Many young individuals look up to figures like Hanumanthu, and such disclosures can have significant consequences on their perceptions and behaviors. The fallout from his actions extends beyond legal issues; it also encompasses the ethical obligations that accompany public visibility. Reactions from the Public and Consequences The public’s reaction to Hanumanthu's arrest has been varied. Many viewers voiced their outrage over both his initial remarks and his later substance use. Social media has been inundated with discussions, memes, and criticisms, illustrating the swift spread of information and opinions in today’s digital environment. Critics contend that individuals like Hanumanthu should be held accountable for their influence, particularly when it concerns endorsing a healthy lifestyle and responsible behavior. On the other hand, some supporters have rallied behind him, advocating for the necessity of empathy and understanding. They highlight the pressures that accompany being a public figure, especially in a hyper-connected world where every action is scrutinized. This divide in public sentiment mirrors a broader societal conversation about celebrity culture, accountability, and the intricacies of mental health and substance use. The Wider Picture of Substance Abuse Hanumanthu's situation is also part of a larger discourse regarding drug abuse in India, especially among the youth. As discussions about mental health and substance use become more widespread, incidents like this underscore the pressing need for awareness and education about addiction and its root causes. The stigma surrounding drug use often hampers open dialogue about the topic, leaving many to endure in silence. Moreover, the legal implications of the NDPS Act spark questions about how society addresses drug-related offenses. While the act aims to deter substance abuse, critics argue that such laws can disproportionately impact certain demographics and do not tackle the underlying causes of addiction. Conversations around harm reduction, rehabilitation, and public health strategies are increasingly relevant within the framework of these laws. Prospects Ahead for Hanumanthu As Hanumanthu navigates the forthcoming legal hurdles, his future remains unpredictable. He faces possible legal repercussions for both his unsatisfactory comments and his substance use, which could greatly affect his career and personal life. The scenario serves as a cautionary example for content creators about the consequences of their expressions and actions, highlighting the need for thoughtful engagement with their audience.…
Nimrat Kaur is an Indian actress celebrated for her contributions to Hindi cinema and American…
Grey divorce refers to the increasing trend of couples aged 50 and older choosing to…