Over 650 positive cases of a novel coronavirus in the last 24 hours, ending Friday morning, have taken India’s tally over 6,400 while the death toll is about to reach the 200-mark.
According to the Union health ministry, the total number of positive COVID-19 cases in India has climbed to 6,412. These include 5,709 active cases while 504 have been either cured or discharged.
In its updated figures at 9 am, the Union ministry added that India has seen an increase of 547 new COVID-19 cases and 30 deaths in the last 12 hours. On Thursday morning, India’s coronavirus tally stood at 5,734.
At 1,364, Maharashtra has seen the highest number of novel coronavirus cases in India so far. It is followed by Tamil Nadu (834) and Delhi (720). Telangana has reported 442 cases.
In Uttar Pradesh, which has sealed its Coronavirus hotspots, 410 cases have been seen so far. It is followed by Kerala at 357 cases and Andhra Pradesh at 348.
The total tally in Madhya Pradesh has risen to 259 while 241 cases have been reported in Gujarat. Karnataka and Haryana have recorded 181 and 169 cases, respectively. Jammu and Kashmir have 158 cases, West Bengal has 116 and Punjab has 101 confirmed cases so far.
Odisha has reported 44 coronavirus cases. Thirty-nine people are infected in Bihar while Uttarakhand has 35 patients and Assam 29. Chandigarh and Himachal Pradesh have 18 cases each while Ladakh has 15 and Jharkhand has 13 positive patients so far. Eleven cases have been reported from the Andaman and Nicobar Islands while 10 were reported from Chhattisgarh.
Goa has reported seven cases of infections, followed by Puducherry at five cases. Manipur has two while Tripura, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh have reported one case each.
The death toll due to the novel coronavirus in India has climbed to 199. The ministry said at least 30 new deaths have been reported since Thursday evening.
Twenty-five deaths were reported from Maharashtra, three from Delhi and one each from Gujarat and Jharkhand. Maharashtra has reported the most coronavirus deaths at 97, followed by Gujarat at 17, Madhya Pradesh 16 and Delhi 12.
Punjab and Tamil Nadu have reported eight fatalities each while Telengana has reported seven deaths.
West Bengal and Karnataka have registered five deaths each. Andhra Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir and Uttar Pradesh have reported four deaths each while Haryana and Rajasthan have recorded three deaths each.
Two deaths have been reported from Kerala. Bihar, Himachal Pradesh, Odisha and Jharkhand reported one fatality each, according to the health ministry data. On Thursday evening, the death toll stood at 169.
Following an ICMR study finding that 40 percent of novel coronavirus cases with severe acute respiratory infection did not have any history of contact with a positive patient or international travel, it has recommended 36 districts in 15 states for priority containment measures.
A study conducted from February 15 to April 2 revealed that a total of 104 of the 5,911 patients with severe acute respiratory infections tested positive for COVID-19. Of these, 40 cases did not report any history of contact with a known case or international travel. The chances of getting infected among SARI patients increased from 0 percent before March 14 to 2.6 percent by April 2.
According to the study, a total of (104) 1.8 percent of the 5,911 SARI patients tested were positive for COVID-19. These cases were reported from 52 districts in 20 states and union territories. “In all, 39.2 percent COVID-19 cases did not report any history of contact with a known case or international travel,” the ICMR study said.
The ICMR highlighted that COVID-19 containment activities need to be targeted in districts reporting positive cases among SARI patients and stated that intensifying sentinel surveillance for coronavirus among SARI patients may be an efficient tool to effectively use resources towards containment and mitigation efforts, it said.
During the study, SARI patients were detected from eight districts in Maharashtra, six in West Bengal and five each in Tamil Nadu and Delhi. In 15 states, more than one percent of SARI patients were COVID-19 positive.
About a third of COVID-19 positive SARI cases did not have any history of contact with the laboratory-confirmed cases or international travel, and such cases were reported from 36 districts in 15 states. These districts need to be prioritized to target COVID-19 containment activities, the study stated.
Also, Read Coronavirus: 1783 People Died In 24 Hours In America, 16 Thousand Killed So Far.
Ajaz Yunus Patel is a cricketer born in Mumbai, India, on October 21, 1988. He…
Ajaz Patel, the skilled left-arm spinner from New Zealand, gained international attention in 2021 when…
Are you dealing with an unusual headache? It could be a cervical or cervicogenic headache.…
In a shocking development, YouTuber Praneeth Hanumanthu has become embroiled in controversy following his detention by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. Initially arrested for making offensive remarks during a podcast, Hanumanthu's predicament has escalated, resulting in further allegations under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act after he tested positive for cannabis consumption. The Context of the Detention The origins of Hanumanthu's difficulties can be linked to a podcast he hosted, which included a conversation that many considered highly unseemly. During this episode, he made inappropriate comments regarding the dynamics between a father and daughter, igniting outrage among viewers and critics alike. This incident quickly garnered the attention of both the public and law enforcement, prompting an investigation by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. The primary allegation centered around his remarks, which were deemed to have crossed the boundaries of acceptable discourse. This scenario raises broader inquiries about accountability and the duties of content creators, particularly in an era where online platforms can amplify messages to a large audience. As a public figure, Hanumanthu's statements carry substantial weight, and the backlash he has encountered signifies society's increasing intolerance towards harmful rhetoric. Charges Related to Substances Things took a turn for the worse for Hanumanthu when, following his arrest, authorities opted to perform a drug test. The results confirmed the presence of cannabis in his system, leading to additional allegations under the NDPS Act. This legislation is a strict law in India aimed at combating substance abuse and trafficking. By testing positive for drug use, Hanumanthu not only worsened his legal troubles but also further tarnished his reputation. The addition of drug-related charges initiates an important discourse about the effects of substance use among influencers and celebrities. Many young individuals look up to figures like Hanumanthu, and such disclosures can have significant consequences on their perceptions and behaviors. The fallout from his actions extends beyond legal issues; it also encompasses the ethical obligations that accompany public visibility. Reactions from the Public and Consequences The public’s reaction to Hanumanthu's arrest has been varied. Many viewers voiced their outrage over both his initial remarks and his later substance use. Social media has been inundated with discussions, memes, and criticisms, illustrating the swift spread of information and opinions in today’s digital environment. Critics contend that individuals like Hanumanthu should be held accountable for their influence, particularly when it concerns endorsing a healthy lifestyle and responsible behavior. On the other hand, some supporters have rallied behind him, advocating for the necessity of empathy and understanding. They highlight the pressures that accompany being a public figure, especially in a hyper-connected world where every action is scrutinized. This divide in public sentiment mirrors a broader societal conversation about celebrity culture, accountability, and the intricacies of mental health and substance use. The Wider Picture of Substance Abuse Hanumanthu's situation is also part of a larger discourse regarding drug abuse in India, especially among the youth. As discussions about mental health and substance use become more widespread, incidents like this underscore the pressing need for awareness and education about addiction and its root causes. The stigma surrounding drug use often hampers open dialogue about the topic, leaving many to endure in silence. Moreover, the legal implications of the NDPS Act spark questions about how society addresses drug-related offenses. While the act aims to deter substance abuse, critics argue that such laws can disproportionately impact certain demographics and do not tackle the underlying causes of addiction. Conversations around harm reduction, rehabilitation, and public health strategies are increasingly relevant within the framework of these laws. Prospects Ahead for Hanumanthu As Hanumanthu navigates the forthcoming legal hurdles, his future remains unpredictable. He faces possible legal repercussions for both his unsatisfactory comments and his substance use, which could greatly affect his career and personal life. The scenario serves as a cautionary example for content creators about the consequences of their expressions and actions, highlighting the need for thoughtful engagement with their audience.…
Nimrat Kaur is an Indian actress celebrated for her contributions to Hindi cinema and American…
Grey divorce refers to the increasing trend of couples aged 50 and older choosing to…