0
0
0
0
After the Allahabad High Court’s order challenging the Allahabad High Court’s order to remove photo-banner banners-posters of violence perpetrators in Lucknow against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), the Yogi government of Uttar Pradesh is taking a legal opinion from the new head in the case is. Sources say that on the orders of the High Court, various legal points are being churned. However, senior officials are reluctant to say anything directly about it. The government has until March 16 to remove the banner-poster.
The Yogi government of Uttar Pradesh has approached the Supreme Court against the High Court’s decision. Additional Chief Secretary Home Avnish Kumar Awasthi also held a meeting with officers at Lok Bhavan on Monday on the situation arising out of the High Court order. Lucknow District Collector Abhishek Prakash, Police Commissioner Sujit Pandey and officials of the Department of Justice were also present in the meeting. It was only after this meeting that the government decided to challenge the High Court’s decision in the Supreme Court.
The Allahabad High Court has summoned the compliance report from the District Magistrate, Lucknow and the Metropolitan, on March 16, ordering the removal of banners and posters with photographs of people demonstrating against the CAA in Lucknow. Photographed poster-banners of 57 protesters have been placed in public places. The Supreme Court has not put any stay on the High Court order at present. On Thursday night too, there was intense churning by senior officials over the move.
A big bench of the Supreme Court will consider
The Supreme Court has sent a large bench of three judges for consideration, considering the issue of posting posters in Lucknow against the CAA for spreading violence and property damage. However, at present there is no restriction on the order of the High Court. During the hearing on Thursday, where the state government justified the action and said that it is outside the purview of the right to privacy, the Supreme Court accepted the action against those who committed the violence, but differed between the right of the individual and the government. That there is no legal basis behind the action of the State Government. A person can do anything unless the law forbids him, but the government can only do what the law allows.
Ajaz Patel, the skilled left-arm spinner from New Zealand, gained international attention in 2021 when…
Are you dealing with an unusual headache? It could be a cervical or cervicogenic headache.…
In a shocking development, YouTuber Praneeth Hanumanthu has become embroiled in controversy following his detention by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. Initially arrested for making offensive remarks during a podcast, Hanumanthu's predicament has escalated, resulting in further allegations under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act after he tested positive for cannabis consumption. The Context of the Detention The origins of Hanumanthu's difficulties can be linked to a podcast he hosted, which included a conversation that many considered highly unseemly. During this episode, he made inappropriate comments regarding the dynamics between a father and daughter, igniting outrage among viewers and critics alike. This incident quickly garnered the attention of both the public and law enforcement, prompting an investigation by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. The primary allegation centered around his remarks, which were deemed to have crossed the boundaries of acceptable discourse. This scenario raises broader inquiries about accountability and the duties of content creators, particularly in an era where online platforms can amplify messages to a large audience. As a public figure, Hanumanthu's statements carry substantial weight, and the backlash he has encountered signifies society's increasing intolerance towards harmful rhetoric. Charges Related to Substances Things took a turn for the worse for Hanumanthu when, following his arrest, authorities opted to perform a drug test. The results confirmed the presence of cannabis in his system, leading to additional allegations under the NDPS Act. This legislation is a strict law in India aimed at combating substance abuse and trafficking. By testing positive for drug use, Hanumanthu not only worsened his legal troubles but also further tarnished his reputation. The addition of drug-related charges initiates an important discourse about the effects of substance use among influencers and celebrities. Many young individuals look up to figures like Hanumanthu, and such disclosures can have significant consequences on their perceptions and behaviors. The fallout from his actions extends beyond legal issues; it also encompasses the ethical obligations that accompany public visibility. Reactions from the Public and Consequences The public’s reaction to Hanumanthu's arrest has been varied. Many viewers voiced their outrage over both his initial remarks and his later substance use. Social media has been inundated with discussions, memes, and criticisms, illustrating the swift spread of information and opinions in today’s digital environment. Critics contend that individuals like Hanumanthu should be held accountable for their influence, particularly when it concerns endorsing a healthy lifestyle and responsible behavior. On the other hand, some supporters have rallied behind him, advocating for the necessity of empathy and understanding. They highlight the pressures that accompany being a public figure, especially in a hyper-connected world where every action is scrutinized. This divide in public sentiment mirrors a broader societal conversation about celebrity culture, accountability, and the intricacies of mental health and substance use. The Wider Picture of Substance Abuse Hanumanthu's situation is also part of a larger discourse regarding drug abuse in India, especially among the youth. As discussions about mental health and substance use become more widespread, incidents like this underscore the pressing need for awareness and education about addiction and its root causes. The stigma surrounding drug use often hampers open dialogue about the topic, leaving many to endure in silence. Moreover, the legal implications of the NDPS Act spark questions about how society addresses drug-related offenses. While the act aims to deter substance abuse, critics argue that such laws can disproportionately impact certain demographics and do not tackle the underlying causes of addiction. Conversations around harm reduction, rehabilitation, and public health strategies are increasingly relevant within the framework of these laws. Prospects Ahead for Hanumanthu As Hanumanthu navigates the forthcoming legal hurdles, his future remains unpredictable. He faces possible legal repercussions for both his unsatisfactory comments and his substance use, which could greatly affect his career and personal life. The scenario serves as a cautionary example for content creators about the consequences of their expressions and actions, highlighting the need for thoughtful engagement with their audience.…
Nimrat Kaur is an Indian actress celebrated for her contributions to Hindi cinema and American…
Grey divorce refers to the increasing trend of couples aged 50 and older choosing to…
In 2024, YouTube sensation MrBeast, born Jimmy Donaldson, has captivated audiences worldwide not only through…