With the increasing arrest of members of the Popular Front of India (PFI) in the violence against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) in UP, the funding strings behind the deep conspiracy can also be revealed soon. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) already had accounts of 25 members and their close associates, including the state president of the organization Wasim Ahmed. Many big fact-finding agencies are expected to be involved in the investigation of transactions in the accounts of the 108 active members now arrested.
In fact, in Uttar Pradesh, for the past one year, the organization has been continuously making efforts to raise sections of youth against the government through offensive and inflammatory posters. The police had earlier registered several cases regarding this, but could not take any concrete action. DGP Hitesh Chandra Awasthi said that in the last four days, in the incidents of violence on 19 and 20 December 2019, the police arrested 108 more active members of PFI. The maximum of 21 accused were arrested in Meerut, 20 in Varanasi, 16 in Bahraich and 14 in Lucknow. The role of some others is being investigated in depth.
The Enforcement Directorate recently submitted a report to the Ministry of Home Affairs examining the bank accounts of PFI and its affiliates during the violent protests against the CAA, in which large amounts were deposited and withdrawn into the PFI account on certain dates in December Facts were revealed. After this report, the increased police action against PFI members in Uttar Pradesh is considered very important.
Police are also taking help of other investigative agencies to delve into the layers of conspiracy behind the incidents of violence. In these situations, the investigation of many bank accounts will be very special on some other dates of the same month besides December 19 and 20, 2019. There are apprehensions that large sums of money were deposited in several accounts of Uttar Pradesh and withdrawn.
Stoning shocked police
Stoning incidents on the lines of Kashmir during violent demonstrations have forced many organizations, from intelligence agencies to the police, to delve into the roots. Some organizations, which are increasing their activism on triple talaq, Article 370 and other issues, increased their penetration through street meetings. During this time, the facts of fundraising were also revealed.
Ban recommended
In the past, after the role of PFI in the incidents of violence, the police administration had written a letter to the Central Government, recommending the organization to be banned like SIMI.
133 PFI members caught so far in UP
The planned role of PFI has emerged behind the violence against the CAA. After the ED tightened its grip on this organization, the UP Police has also taken major action. DGP Hitesh Chandra Awasthi said that in the last four days, in the incidents of violence on 19 and 20 December 2019, the police arrested 108 more active members of PFI. A total of 133 PFI members have been arrested so far in the state. These include 14 in Lucknow, three in Sitapur, 21 in Meerut, nine in Ghaziabad, six in Muzaffarnagar, seven in Shamli, four in Bijnor, 20 in Varanasi, five in Kanpur, one in Gonda, 16 in Bahraich, one in Hapur and Jaunpur. – There has been an arrest.
Here is more activity
PFI is more active in Shamli, Muzaffarnagar, Meerut, Bijnor, Lucknow, Barabanki, Gonda, Bahraich, Varanasi, Azamgarh, Ghaziabad, and Sitapur.
This is how PFI foundation
Following the ban on the Student Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) organization in 2001, the National Development Front Kerala, Manitha Nithi Parsai Tamil Nadu and Karnataka Forum for Dignity Organizations held a joint conference in 2006, followed by Kerala on 22 November 2006. The Popular Front of India (PFI) was established. According to intelligence reports, many senior officials and members of SIMI have played an active role in the PFI.
Ajaz Patel, the skilled left-arm spinner from New Zealand, gained international attention in 2021 when…
Are you dealing with an unusual headache? It could be a cervical or cervicogenic headache.…
In a shocking development, YouTuber Praneeth Hanumanthu has become embroiled in controversy following his detention by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. Initially arrested for making offensive remarks during a podcast, Hanumanthu's predicament has escalated, resulting in further allegations under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act after he tested positive for cannabis consumption. The Context of the Detention The origins of Hanumanthu's difficulties can be linked to a podcast he hosted, which included a conversation that many considered highly unseemly. During this episode, he made inappropriate comments regarding the dynamics between a father and daughter, igniting outrage among viewers and critics alike. This incident quickly garnered the attention of both the public and law enforcement, prompting an investigation by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. The primary allegation centered around his remarks, which were deemed to have crossed the boundaries of acceptable discourse. This scenario raises broader inquiries about accountability and the duties of content creators, particularly in an era where online platforms can amplify messages to a large audience. As a public figure, Hanumanthu's statements carry substantial weight, and the backlash he has encountered signifies society's increasing intolerance towards harmful rhetoric. Charges Related to Substances Things took a turn for the worse for Hanumanthu when, following his arrest, authorities opted to perform a drug test. The results confirmed the presence of cannabis in his system, leading to additional allegations under the NDPS Act. This legislation is a strict law in India aimed at combating substance abuse and trafficking. By testing positive for drug use, Hanumanthu not only worsened his legal troubles but also further tarnished his reputation. The addition of drug-related charges initiates an important discourse about the effects of substance use among influencers and celebrities. Many young individuals look up to figures like Hanumanthu, and such disclosures can have significant consequences on their perceptions and behaviors. The fallout from his actions extends beyond legal issues; it also encompasses the ethical obligations that accompany public visibility. Reactions from the Public and Consequences The public’s reaction to Hanumanthu's arrest has been varied. Many viewers voiced their outrage over both his initial remarks and his later substance use. Social media has been inundated with discussions, memes, and criticisms, illustrating the swift spread of information and opinions in today’s digital environment. Critics contend that individuals like Hanumanthu should be held accountable for their influence, particularly when it concerns endorsing a healthy lifestyle and responsible behavior. On the other hand, some supporters have rallied behind him, advocating for the necessity of empathy and understanding. They highlight the pressures that accompany being a public figure, especially in a hyper-connected world where every action is scrutinized. This divide in public sentiment mirrors a broader societal conversation about celebrity culture, accountability, and the intricacies of mental health and substance use. The Wider Picture of Substance Abuse Hanumanthu's situation is also part of a larger discourse regarding drug abuse in India, especially among the youth. As discussions about mental health and substance use become more widespread, incidents like this underscore the pressing need for awareness and education about addiction and its root causes. The stigma surrounding drug use often hampers open dialogue about the topic, leaving many to endure in silence. Moreover, the legal implications of the NDPS Act spark questions about how society addresses drug-related offenses. While the act aims to deter substance abuse, critics argue that such laws can disproportionately impact certain demographics and do not tackle the underlying causes of addiction. Conversations around harm reduction, rehabilitation, and public health strategies are increasingly relevant within the framework of these laws. Prospects Ahead for Hanumanthu As Hanumanthu navigates the forthcoming legal hurdles, his future remains unpredictable. He faces possible legal repercussions for both his unsatisfactory comments and his substance use, which could greatly affect his career and personal life. The scenario serves as a cautionary example for content creators about the consequences of their expressions and actions, highlighting the need for thoughtful engagement with their audience.…
Nimrat Kaur is an Indian actress celebrated for her contributions to Hindi cinema and American…
Grey divorce refers to the increasing trend of couples aged 50 and older choosing to…
In 2024, YouTube sensation MrBeast, born Jimmy Donaldson, has captivated audiences worldwide not only through…