0
0
0
0
In March 2017, in a surprising reversal, the British Parliament passed a resolution describing Gilgit-Baltistan as an integral part of India's Jammu and Kashmir.
New Delhi: While Pakistan has been raising the issue of Jammu and Kashmir on several international forums for many days, it is pertinent to know that a country of double character has to share the weight of truth and facts with the countries it is currently lobbying. is.
In March 2017, in a surprising reversal, the British Parliament passed a resolution citing Gilgit-Baltistan as an integral part of India’s Jammu and Kashmir and condemned Pakistan for making it a province and changing the region’s demographics.
In the resolution passed by the British MPs, Gilgit-Baltistan was described as a legitimate and constitutional part of Jammu and Kashmir, which was illegally annexed by Pakistan in 1947.
Gilgit-Baltistan ‘order’: India protests with Pakistan
The motion was tabled in the British Parliament on 23 March 2017 by Bob Blackman of the Conservative Party. It was said that Pakistan is trying to take an area that does not belong to it.
According to the resolution of the British Parliament, “Gilgit-Baltistan is a legitimate and constitutional part of India’s Jammu and Kashmir, which Pakistan illegally annexed in 1947 and where the fundamental rights of the people are being violated in which freedom of expression
The right to be included. ” British lawmakers accused Pakistan of adopting a policy that changed the demographics of the Gilgit-Baltistan region in violation of the state-specific ordinance.
‘Pakistan has forcibly captured PoK, the human rights situation is continuously deteriorating’
He also called the construction of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) illegal. According to the proposal, “The illegal and forced construction of CPEC is an attempt to interfere in the disputed area”.
The territory of Gilgit-Baltistan has been under its occupation since the partition of India by Pakistan invading Jammu and Kashmir.
Under Pakistan’s control, it was made a northern administrative region beyond the Kashmir region, which is illegally occupied by Islamabad.
Source: Syndicate feed
Ajaz Yunus Patel is a cricketer born in Mumbai, India, on October 21, 1988. He…
Ajaz Patel, the skilled left-arm spinner from New Zealand, gained international attention in 2021 when…
Are you dealing with an unusual headache? It could be a cervical or cervicogenic headache.…
In a shocking development, YouTuber Praneeth Hanumanthu has become embroiled in controversy following his detention by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. Initially arrested for making offensive remarks during a podcast, Hanumanthu's predicament has escalated, resulting in further allegations under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act after he tested positive for cannabis consumption. The Context of the Detention The origins of Hanumanthu's difficulties can be linked to a podcast he hosted, which included a conversation that many considered highly unseemly. During this episode, he made inappropriate comments regarding the dynamics between a father and daughter, igniting outrage among viewers and critics alike. This incident quickly garnered the attention of both the public and law enforcement, prompting an investigation by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. The primary allegation centered around his remarks, which were deemed to have crossed the boundaries of acceptable discourse. This scenario raises broader inquiries about accountability and the duties of content creators, particularly in an era where online platforms can amplify messages to a large audience. As a public figure, Hanumanthu's statements carry substantial weight, and the backlash he has encountered signifies society's increasing intolerance towards harmful rhetoric. Charges Related to Substances Things took a turn for the worse for Hanumanthu when, following his arrest, authorities opted to perform a drug test. The results confirmed the presence of cannabis in his system, leading to additional allegations under the NDPS Act. This legislation is a strict law in India aimed at combating substance abuse and trafficking. By testing positive for drug use, Hanumanthu not only worsened his legal troubles but also further tarnished his reputation. The addition of drug-related charges initiates an important discourse about the effects of substance use among influencers and celebrities. Many young individuals look up to figures like Hanumanthu, and such disclosures can have significant consequences on their perceptions and behaviors. The fallout from his actions extends beyond legal issues; it also encompasses the ethical obligations that accompany public visibility. Reactions from the Public and Consequences The public’s reaction to Hanumanthu's arrest has been varied. Many viewers voiced their outrage over both his initial remarks and his later substance use. Social media has been inundated with discussions, memes, and criticisms, illustrating the swift spread of information and opinions in today’s digital environment. Critics contend that individuals like Hanumanthu should be held accountable for their influence, particularly when it concerns endorsing a healthy lifestyle and responsible behavior. On the other hand, some supporters have rallied behind him, advocating for the necessity of empathy and understanding. They highlight the pressures that accompany being a public figure, especially in a hyper-connected world where every action is scrutinized. This divide in public sentiment mirrors a broader societal conversation about celebrity culture, accountability, and the intricacies of mental health and substance use. The Wider Picture of Substance Abuse Hanumanthu's situation is also part of a larger discourse regarding drug abuse in India, especially among the youth. As discussions about mental health and substance use become more widespread, incidents like this underscore the pressing need for awareness and education about addiction and its root causes. The stigma surrounding drug use often hampers open dialogue about the topic, leaving many to endure in silence. Moreover, the legal implications of the NDPS Act spark questions about how society addresses drug-related offenses. While the act aims to deter substance abuse, critics argue that such laws can disproportionately impact certain demographics and do not tackle the underlying causes of addiction. Conversations around harm reduction, rehabilitation, and public health strategies are increasingly relevant within the framework of these laws. Prospects Ahead for Hanumanthu As Hanumanthu navigates the forthcoming legal hurdles, his future remains unpredictable. He faces possible legal repercussions for both his unsatisfactory comments and his substance use, which could greatly affect his career and personal life. The scenario serves as a cautionary example for content creators about the consequences of their expressions and actions, highlighting the need for thoughtful engagement with their audience.…
Nimrat Kaur is an Indian actress celebrated for her contributions to Hindi cinema and American…
Grey divorce refers to the increasing trend of couples aged 50 and older choosing to…