0
0
0
0
Fraud
New Delhi, Jagran Bureau. No matter how safe the banking system of the public sector banks are, they have failed to prevent banking fraud. Not only is online fraud increasing, but frauds in disbursing loans or depositing cash are also not taking the name of freezing. A total of 71,543 crore fraud cases have been reported in the banking sector of the country in the financial year 2018-19. This amount is almost four times the fraud of Rs 19,455 crore in banks in FY 2014-15. Of this, 90.2 per cent is owned by public sector banks.
Banking sector regulator Reserve Bank of India (RBI) itself believes that large scale fraud cases are not stopping in banks and most such frauds are happening in public sector banks. It is clear from RBI’s recent report on banking trends and progress that major action is needed at the level of public sector banks to prevent fraud.
RBI has said that the biggest loss is happening in the loan portfolio. In this, the number of incidents and the amount involved is constantly increasing. Famous companies are also involved in defrauding banks through fraud. The central bank has said that the companies which have used the loan amount for any other purpose have suffered the most from banks.
For example, many companies have taken loans in the name of the main company and then put it in their other fake companies. For this, they have not even taken a no-objection certificate from the lending banks. Out of the loss of Rs 71,543 crore due to fraud to the entire banking sector in the year 2018-19, Rs 64,548 crore is due to debt related matters. According to the central bank, out of 6,801 incidents of banking fraud during the last financial year, 55.4 per cent of the public sector banks accounted for these banks while 90.2 per cent of the losses were from these banks. Public sector banks account for 91.6 per cent of the major scams (more than Rs 50 crore).
However, the RBI report states that despite all the claims at the level of banks, the perpetrators of their security system continue to succeed. Had the system of banks been corrected, the amount of loss from frauds in the year 2014-15 was Rs 19,455 crore, it would not have increased to Rs 71,543 crore after five years i.e. in 2018-19. Meanwhile, the amount of fraud in loan cases increased from Rs 17,122 crore to Rs 64,548 crore.
Ajaz Yunus Patel is a cricketer born in Mumbai, India, on October 21, 1988. He…
Ajaz Patel, the skilled left-arm spinner from New Zealand, gained international attention in 2021 when…
Are you dealing with an unusual headache? It could be a cervical or cervicogenic headache.…
In a shocking development, YouTuber Praneeth Hanumanthu has become embroiled in controversy following his detention by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. Initially arrested for making offensive remarks during a podcast, Hanumanthu's predicament has escalated, resulting in further allegations under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act after he tested positive for cannabis consumption. The Context of the Detention The origins of Hanumanthu's difficulties can be linked to a podcast he hosted, which included a conversation that many considered highly unseemly. During this episode, he made inappropriate comments regarding the dynamics between a father and daughter, igniting outrage among viewers and critics alike. This incident quickly garnered the attention of both the public and law enforcement, prompting an investigation by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. The primary allegation centered around his remarks, which were deemed to have crossed the boundaries of acceptable discourse. This scenario raises broader inquiries about accountability and the duties of content creators, particularly in an era where online platforms can amplify messages to a large audience. As a public figure, Hanumanthu's statements carry substantial weight, and the backlash he has encountered signifies society's increasing intolerance towards harmful rhetoric. Charges Related to Substances Things took a turn for the worse for Hanumanthu when, following his arrest, authorities opted to perform a drug test. The results confirmed the presence of cannabis in his system, leading to additional allegations under the NDPS Act. This legislation is a strict law in India aimed at combating substance abuse and trafficking. By testing positive for drug use, Hanumanthu not only worsened his legal troubles but also further tarnished his reputation. The addition of drug-related charges initiates an important discourse about the effects of substance use among influencers and celebrities. Many young individuals look up to figures like Hanumanthu, and such disclosures can have significant consequences on their perceptions and behaviors. The fallout from his actions extends beyond legal issues; it also encompasses the ethical obligations that accompany public visibility. Reactions from the Public and Consequences The public’s reaction to Hanumanthu's arrest has been varied. Many viewers voiced their outrage over both his initial remarks and his later substance use. Social media has been inundated with discussions, memes, and criticisms, illustrating the swift spread of information and opinions in today’s digital environment. Critics contend that individuals like Hanumanthu should be held accountable for their influence, particularly when it concerns endorsing a healthy lifestyle and responsible behavior. On the other hand, some supporters have rallied behind him, advocating for the necessity of empathy and understanding. They highlight the pressures that accompany being a public figure, especially in a hyper-connected world where every action is scrutinized. This divide in public sentiment mirrors a broader societal conversation about celebrity culture, accountability, and the intricacies of mental health and substance use. The Wider Picture of Substance Abuse Hanumanthu's situation is also part of a larger discourse regarding drug abuse in India, especially among the youth. As discussions about mental health and substance use become more widespread, incidents like this underscore the pressing need for awareness and education about addiction and its root causes. The stigma surrounding drug use often hampers open dialogue about the topic, leaving many to endure in silence. Moreover, the legal implications of the NDPS Act spark questions about how society addresses drug-related offenses. While the act aims to deter substance abuse, critics argue that such laws can disproportionately impact certain demographics and do not tackle the underlying causes of addiction. Conversations around harm reduction, rehabilitation, and public health strategies are increasingly relevant within the framework of these laws. Prospects Ahead for Hanumanthu As Hanumanthu navigates the forthcoming legal hurdles, his future remains unpredictable. He faces possible legal repercussions for both his unsatisfactory comments and his substance use, which could greatly affect his career and personal life. The scenario serves as a cautionary example for content creators about the consequences of their expressions and actions, highlighting the need for thoughtful engagement with their audience.…
Nimrat Kaur is an Indian actress celebrated for her contributions to Hindi cinema and American…
Grey divorce refers to the increasing trend of couples aged 50 and older choosing to…