England defeated Australia by one wicket on Sunday on the fourth day of the third Test match of the Ashes series played at Headingley ground.
England, on the fourth day of the third Test of the Ashes series, played at Headingley ground on the basis of a 76-run unbeaten match-winning partnership for the last wicket between all-rounder Ben Stokes (135 not out) and Jack Leach (1 not out) Defeated by one wicket in an exciting match. This is the fourth time in the history of Test cricket that England has managed to win the match by one wicket. Earlier, he had won by one wicket against South Africa in Cape Town in 1922/23, against Australia in Melbourne in 1907/08 and against Australia at the Oval in 1902.
After this victory, England has achieved a 1-1 draw in the five-match Ashes Test Series. Australia won the first match of the series by 251 runs while the second match was a draw. Australia had scored 179 runs in the first innings and then it was England’s 67 for their first innings and got a lead of 112 runs. After this, Australia scored 246 runs in their second innings and set a target of 359 runs for victory in front of England.
England achieved this target by losing nine wickets. Host England’s winning hero Stokes scored an unbeaten century of 135 runs in 219 balls with 11 fours and eight sixes. He scored the eighth century of his career. Many sports experts believe that this is his best innings ever.
Earlier, England, chasing the target of 359 runs from Australia, started their scores on Sunday morning by 156 runs for three wickets and scored 238 for four wickets till lunch. After lunch, England’s team was in a lot of trouble and they lost five more wickets within the next 48 runs. The hosts had lost nine wickets till the score of 286 runs and were yet to make 73 runs to win while their last pair were struggling at the crease.
Stokes was playing the lead role in this struggle, while Leach was supporting him well. Both the batsmen dashed the hopes of Australia’s definitive victory and gave England a thrilling victory with a crucial 76-run and match-winning partnership for the last wicket.
In addition to Stokes, captain Joe Root contributed 77, Joe Denly 50, Johnny Bairstow 36, Joffre Archer 15, Jason Roy eight, Rory Burns seven and Jose Butler and Chris Woakes contributed one each while Stuart. Broke out without opening a broad account. For Australia, Josh Hazlewood took four wickets, Nathan Lyon took two wickets and Pat Cummins and James Pattinson took one wicket each.
In a shocking development, YouTuber Praneeth Hanumanthu has become embroiled in controversy following his detention by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. Initially arrested for making offensive remarks during a podcast, Hanumanthu's predicament has escalated, resulting in further allegations under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act after he tested positive for cannabis consumption. The Context of the Detention The origins of Hanumanthu's difficulties can be linked to a podcast he hosted, which included a conversation that many considered highly unseemly. During this episode, he made inappropriate comments regarding the dynamics between a father and daughter, igniting outrage among viewers and critics alike. This incident quickly garnered the attention of both the public and law enforcement, prompting an investigation by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. The primary allegation centered around his remarks, which were deemed to have crossed the boundaries of acceptable discourse. This scenario raises broader inquiries about accountability and the duties of content creators, particularly in an era where online platforms can amplify messages to a large audience. As a public figure, Hanumanthu's statements carry substantial weight, and the backlash he has encountered signifies society's increasing intolerance towards harmful rhetoric. Charges Related to Substances Things took a turn for the worse for Hanumanthu when, following his arrest, authorities opted to perform a drug test. The results confirmed the presence of cannabis in his system, leading to additional allegations under the NDPS Act. This legislation is a strict law in India aimed at combating substance abuse and trafficking. By testing positive for drug use, Hanumanthu not only worsened his legal troubles but also further tarnished his reputation. The addition of drug-related charges initiates an important discourse about the effects of substance use among influencers and celebrities. Many young individuals look up to figures like Hanumanthu, and such disclosures can have significant consequences on their perceptions and behaviors. The fallout from his actions extends beyond legal issues; it also encompasses the ethical obligations that accompany public visibility. Reactions from the Public and Consequences The public’s reaction to Hanumanthu's arrest has been varied. Many viewers voiced their outrage over both his initial remarks and his later substance use. Social media has been inundated with discussions, memes, and criticisms, illustrating the swift spread of information and opinions in today’s digital environment. Critics contend that individuals like Hanumanthu should be held accountable for their influence, particularly when it concerns endorsing a healthy lifestyle and responsible behavior. On the other hand, some supporters have rallied behind him, advocating for the necessity of empathy and understanding. They highlight the pressures that accompany being a public figure, especially in a hyper-connected world where every action is scrutinized. This divide in public sentiment mirrors a broader societal conversation about celebrity culture, accountability, and the intricacies of mental health and substance use. The Wider Picture of Substance Abuse Hanumanthu's situation is also part of a larger discourse regarding drug abuse in India, especially among the youth. As discussions about mental health and substance use become more widespread, incidents like this underscore the pressing need for awareness and education about addiction and its root causes. The stigma surrounding drug use often hampers open dialogue about the topic, leaving many to endure in silence. Moreover, the legal implications of the NDPS Act spark questions about how society addresses drug-related offenses. While the act aims to deter substance abuse, critics argue that such laws can disproportionately impact certain demographics and do not tackle the underlying causes of addiction. Conversations around harm reduction, rehabilitation, and public health strategies are increasingly relevant within the framework of these laws. Prospects Ahead for Hanumanthu As Hanumanthu navigates the forthcoming legal hurdles, his future remains unpredictable. He faces possible legal repercussions for both his unsatisfactory comments and his substance use, which could greatly affect his career and personal life. The scenario serves as a cautionary example for content creators about the consequences of their expressions and actions, highlighting the need for thoughtful engagement with their audience.…
Nimrat Kaur is an Indian actress celebrated for her contributions to Hindi cinema and American…
Grey divorce refers to the increasing trend of couples aged 50 and older choosing to…
In 2024, YouTube sensation MrBeast, born Jimmy Donaldson, has captivated audiences worldwide not only through…
CarryMinati, also known as Ajey Nagar, has once again made waves in the Indian and…
A video featuring Akash Ambani and Isha Ambani, the famous twin children of India’s richest…