0
0
0
0
Arvind Kejriwal News LIVE: 'Kejriwal demanded Rs 100 crore bribe, we have proof...', ED argues in court
LIVE Arvind Kejriwal News This Thursday represents the end of Delhi mayor Arvind Kejriwal’s remand period under the ED. Kejriwal was imprisoned in connection with an excise policy theft involving money laundering. before this case, the ED appeared with Arvind Kejriwal before Delhi’s Rouse Avenue Court and asked that the Delhi CM’s remand be prolonged by seven days. The court is yet to reach a decision on this matter.
New Delhi correspondent for Jagran. Following the expiration of the remand period in the money laundering case pertaining to the Excise Policy scam, the ED restored Arvind Kejriwal, the state’s chief minister in the Rouse Avenue Court on Thursday. ED asked the court to prolong the remand by seven days during the appearance. The court is currently deferring its judgment on whether to prolong the remand.
While Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal’s wife Sunita Kejriwal came in the courtroom, she declared, “Arvind is currently being harassed in custody.” The people will respond to this dictatorship, and it aren’t going continue.”
Mr. Kejriwal hasn’t yet supplied the mobile password, the ED said the court. As an outcome, testing the digital data was not available. The court is still deliberating whether to prolong the remand.
ED stated during the court hearing that they was proof that Kejriwal had asked for a bribe totaling Rs 100 crore in relation to the taxation policy case. Can every individual accomplish what Kejriwal has so many powerful adherents?
In backing Kejriwal, lawyer Mohit Mathur stated, “We are not against the remand; ED can keep Kejriwal on as many days as it wants.” Senior lawyer Ramesh Gupta stated that additional research should be undertaken into the Rs 55 crore that Reddy provided.
“A high-ranking Supreme Court judgment said in one of his decisions that taking a bribe of Rs 100 crore is suspicious,” Kejriwal stated in court. In this case, a decision has not yet been made. The excise scam is that you should be publicly exposed by ED as a fraud in front of everyone in the country. Following his defamatory statement, Sharath Reddy donated Rs 55 crore to the BJP via electoral bond.”
“What is the justification for arresting the incumbent Chief Minister?” Kejriwal said.
Arvind Kejriwal argued in court that there is no rationale for arresting a sitting premier when Manish Sisodia presented the excise policy documents to me in front of numerous MLAs. The accused made their statement, but it was repeatedly recorded, and when they swore against me, they were granted bail. After making a statement against us in the seventh statement, one accused person was granted bail and did not speak against me in the following six statements. According to Kejriwal, the agency acquired thirty thousand pages, but the court did not view them.
In the ED case, Arvind Kejriwal declared, “There is little proof against me.”
In favor of Kejriwal, prominent lawyer Ramesh Gupta asked for freedom to express his opinions. In the interim, Kejriwal declared, “I have been detained, but there is no evidence against me. The investigation has been going on for two years.”
While reading the remand ask for, ASG SV Raju, representing the ED, stated that although Kejriwal’s comments had been recorded, he still needs to face one person. Testing must be carried out on the digital data that was taken. In the ED’s interrogation, Kejriwal is not answering inquiries and his lawyer is not providing ITR with information. The ED has requested a seven-day extension of the remand.
Arvind Kejriwal, the chief minister of Delhi, declared, “This is a political conspiracy and people will respond to it,” prior to the court session. After his ED incarceration in the alcohol policy case ends today, Kejriwal has been transported to the Rouse Avenue court.
Arvind Kejriwal and the economic development team have arrived at Rouse Avenue Court for his appearance. Gopal Rai and Delhi Minister Atishi are also in the courtroom at the present time. Sunita Kejriwal, CM Arvind Kejriwal’s wife, is also present at the same time.
Mr. Arvind News LIVE: Delhi-related ED departs for court
Arvind Kejriwal’s ED remand is coming to an end today. ED and Delhi CM are leaving for their appearance at Rouse Avenue Court.
Ajaz Patel, the skilled left-arm spinner from New Zealand, gained international attention in 2021 when…
Are you dealing with an unusual headache? It could be a cervical or cervicogenic headache.…
In a shocking development, YouTuber Praneeth Hanumanthu has become embroiled in controversy following his detention by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. Initially arrested for making offensive remarks during a podcast, Hanumanthu's predicament has escalated, resulting in further allegations under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act after he tested positive for cannabis consumption. The Context of the Detention The origins of Hanumanthu's difficulties can be linked to a podcast he hosted, which included a conversation that many considered highly unseemly. During this episode, he made inappropriate comments regarding the dynamics between a father and daughter, igniting outrage among viewers and critics alike. This incident quickly garnered the attention of both the public and law enforcement, prompting an investigation by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. The primary allegation centered around his remarks, which were deemed to have crossed the boundaries of acceptable discourse. This scenario raises broader inquiries about accountability and the duties of content creators, particularly in an era where online platforms can amplify messages to a large audience. As a public figure, Hanumanthu's statements carry substantial weight, and the backlash he has encountered signifies society's increasing intolerance towards harmful rhetoric. Charges Related to Substances Things took a turn for the worse for Hanumanthu when, following his arrest, authorities opted to perform a drug test. The results confirmed the presence of cannabis in his system, leading to additional allegations under the NDPS Act. This legislation is a strict law in India aimed at combating substance abuse and trafficking. By testing positive for drug use, Hanumanthu not only worsened his legal troubles but also further tarnished his reputation. The addition of drug-related charges initiates an important discourse about the effects of substance use among influencers and celebrities. Many young individuals look up to figures like Hanumanthu, and such disclosures can have significant consequences on their perceptions and behaviors. The fallout from his actions extends beyond legal issues; it also encompasses the ethical obligations that accompany public visibility. Reactions from the Public and Consequences The public’s reaction to Hanumanthu's arrest has been varied. Many viewers voiced their outrage over both his initial remarks and his later substance use. Social media has been inundated with discussions, memes, and criticisms, illustrating the swift spread of information and opinions in today’s digital environment. Critics contend that individuals like Hanumanthu should be held accountable for their influence, particularly when it concerns endorsing a healthy lifestyle and responsible behavior. On the other hand, some supporters have rallied behind him, advocating for the necessity of empathy and understanding. They highlight the pressures that accompany being a public figure, especially in a hyper-connected world where every action is scrutinized. This divide in public sentiment mirrors a broader societal conversation about celebrity culture, accountability, and the intricacies of mental health and substance use. The Wider Picture of Substance Abuse Hanumanthu's situation is also part of a larger discourse regarding drug abuse in India, especially among the youth. As discussions about mental health and substance use become more widespread, incidents like this underscore the pressing need for awareness and education about addiction and its root causes. The stigma surrounding drug use often hampers open dialogue about the topic, leaving many to endure in silence. Moreover, the legal implications of the NDPS Act spark questions about how society addresses drug-related offenses. While the act aims to deter substance abuse, critics argue that such laws can disproportionately impact certain demographics and do not tackle the underlying causes of addiction. Conversations around harm reduction, rehabilitation, and public health strategies are increasingly relevant within the framework of these laws. Prospects Ahead for Hanumanthu As Hanumanthu navigates the forthcoming legal hurdles, his future remains unpredictable. He faces possible legal repercussions for both his unsatisfactory comments and his substance use, which could greatly affect his career and personal life. The scenario serves as a cautionary example for content creators about the consequences of their expressions and actions, highlighting the need for thoughtful engagement with their audience.…
Nimrat Kaur is an Indian actress celebrated for her contributions to Hindi cinema and American…
Grey divorce refers to the increasing trend of couples aged 50 and older choosing to…
In 2024, YouTube sensation MrBeast, born Jimmy Donaldson, has captivated audiences worldwide not only through…