0
0
0
0
Study named COM-COV led by Oxford University
A study in Britain has revealed that it is safe to take two different corona virus vaccine supplements, but this increases the risk of mild to moderate symptoms.
The team of scientists, led by Oxford University, started a study called COM-COV to find out how the second dose of the Oxford / AstraZeneca vaccine (similar to the vaccination of Pfizer after AstraZeneca) after applying the Pfizer / Bioentech vaccine. What kind of
According to the report published in the medical journal ‘Lancet’ on Wednesday, the research team said that the combination of the two types of vaccines brings short-term symptoms but there is nothing to worry about safety.
Scientists said that the results of this stage indicate how people feel after vaccination, it is not yet known what effect the immunity has on taking two types of vaccines.
Associate Professor Mathew Snape, a pediatric and vaccine specialist at Oxford University, said, “The study results indicate that the addition of vaccine supplements may increase the number of days of non-work after vaccination and vaccination of health workers.” It is important to consider this fact while planning for.
He said, “It is important that it has not revealed security concerns or hints.” (Right now) we have not known whether immunity is affected or not. We hope that related figures will come in the coming months. ”
Researchers have reported that adding vaccine supplements may cause mild symptoms such as chills, fatigue, headaches, and fever, but this will be for a short time. He told that this study was done on people aged 50 years or more and such symptoms can be more in the youth.
Those who studied said that 800 participants were involved in the research. They reported that only one in 10 reported fever when they were given both doses of AstraZeneca (similarly both Pfizer’s doses) at a four-week gap, while 34% reported fever when one dose of AstraZeneca and another dose of Pfizer. Complained
The study was further expanded last month and a study is also being done on the impact of the Moderna and Novavax covid vaccine on 1050 participants.
A well-written essay requires attention to ensure the content is coherent, well-structured, and polished. This…
In a stunning outcome that defied many pre-election predictions, former President Donald Trump decisively defeated…
Ajaz Yunus Patel is a cricketer born in Mumbai, India, on October 21, 1988. He…
Ajaz Patel, the skilled left-arm spinner from New Zealand, gained international attention in 2021 when…
Are you dealing with an unusual headache? It could be a cervical or cervicogenic headache.…
In a shocking development, YouTuber Praneeth Hanumanthu has become embroiled in controversy following his detention by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. Initially arrested for making offensive remarks during a podcast, Hanumanthu's predicament has escalated, resulting in further allegations under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act after he tested positive for cannabis consumption. The Context of the Detention The origins of Hanumanthu's difficulties can be linked to a podcast he hosted, which included a conversation that many considered highly unseemly. During this episode, he made inappropriate comments regarding the dynamics between a father and daughter, igniting outrage among viewers and critics alike. This incident quickly garnered the attention of both the public and law enforcement, prompting an investigation by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. The primary allegation centered around his remarks, which were deemed to have crossed the boundaries of acceptable discourse. This scenario raises broader inquiries about accountability and the duties of content creators, particularly in an era where online platforms can amplify messages to a large audience. As a public figure, Hanumanthu's statements carry substantial weight, and the backlash he has encountered signifies society's increasing intolerance towards harmful rhetoric. Charges Related to Substances Things took a turn for the worse for Hanumanthu when, following his arrest, authorities opted to perform a drug test. The results confirmed the presence of cannabis in his system, leading to additional allegations under the NDPS Act. This legislation is a strict law in India aimed at combating substance abuse and trafficking. By testing positive for drug use, Hanumanthu not only worsened his legal troubles but also further tarnished his reputation. The addition of drug-related charges initiates an important discourse about the effects of substance use among influencers and celebrities. Many young individuals look up to figures like Hanumanthu, and such disclosures can have significant consequences on their perceptions and behaviors. The fallout from his actions extends beyond legal issues; it also encompasses the ethical obligations that accompany public visibility. Reactions from the Public and Consequences The public’s reaction to Hanumanthu's arrest has been varied. Many viewers voiced their outrage over both his initial remarks and his later substance use. Social media has been inundated with discussions, memes, and criticisms, illustrating the swift spread of information and opinions in today’s digital environment. Critics contend that individuals like Hanumanthu should be held accountable for their influence, particularly when it concerns endorsing a healthy lifestyle and responsible behavior. On the other hand, some supporters have rallied behind him, advocating for the necessity of empathy and understanding. They highlight the pressures that accompany being a public figure, especially in a hyper-connected world where every action is scrutinized. This divide in public sentiment mirrors a broader societal conversation about celebrity culture, accountability, and the intricacies of mental health and substance use. The Wider Picture of Substance Abuse Hanumanthu's situation is also part of a larger discourse regarding drug abuse in India, especially among the youth. As discussions about mental health and substance use become more widespread, incidents like this underscore the pressing need for awareness and education about addiction and its root causes. The stigma surrounding drug use often hampers open dialogue about the topic, leaving many to endure in silence. Moreover, the legal implications of the NDPS Act spark questions about how society addresses drug-related offenses. While the act aims to deter substance abuse, critics argue that such laws can disproportionately impact certain demographics and do not tackle the underlying causes of addiction. Conversations around harm reduction, rehabilitation, and public health strategies are increasingly relevant within the framework of these laws. Prospects Ahead for Hanumanthu As Hanumanthu navigates the forthcoming legal hurdles, his future remains unpredictable. He faces possible legal repercussions for both his unsatisfactory comments and his substance use, which could greatly affect his career and personal life. The scenario serves as a cautionary example for content creators about the consequences of their expressions and actions, highlighting the need for thoughtful engagement with their audience.…