0
0
0
0
Herd immunity is believed to develop among those who conquer the corona, and they are less likely to become infected again for the next few months. But, a new study in the US has revealed that at least 10 days are very important for the coronas who are discharged from the hospital. Negligence during this period may require hospitalization again. Even the life of the victim can be lost. This period is more dangerous for the elderly.
60 percent more likely to return to hospital
Researchers found during the study that people who recovered from a corona infection and were discharged from the hospital had a 40–60% higher risk of being re-admitted within 10 days. These were compared to serious patients of similar duration and same hospitalized heart and pneumonia.
After 60 days, the danger decreases
The study, published in the journal JAMA, states that the risk of re-admission or death of a corona patient 60 days after discharge from the hospital decreases compared to patients with other serious illnesses. Therefore, it is important that as a precautionary measures, maximum attention should be paid to the post-recovery of corona.
132 hospitals were involved in the study
The research involved approximately 2,200 aged patients who had undergone treatment in 132 hospitals. After being discharged from the hospital, his condition was compared to about 1,800 pneumonia-related patients and 3,500 heart patients. Pneumonia and heart patients were also admitted in the same hospitals during that time.
Nine percent patients died
In the report, researchers said that nine percent of patients died in the first two months after being discharged from the hospital, while 20 percent had to be hospitalized again due to shock. This figure is different from the 18.5% patients who died during hospitalization.
Age also makes a difference
Researchers say age emerged as a major factor in the study. Nearly half of those who died in the two months after discharge from the hospital were aged 70–80.
Re-infection is more deadly
Corona infection was the reason for 30 percent of patients being re-admitted to the hospital, while 8.5 percent had to return due to other disorders. It is alarming that 22 per cent of the elderly who were re-admitted had to be put on ventilator.
Expert view
According to John P. Donnelly, an epidemiologist and lead researcher at the University of Michigan (USA), coronas infected are at a risk of two weeks after being discharged from the hospital for people suffering from other serious illnesses. This period can be dangerous for anyone.
Ajaz Yunus Patel is a cricketer born in Mumbai, India, on October 21, 1988. He…
Ajaz Patel, the skilled left-arm spinner from New Zealand, gained international attention in 2021 when…
Are you dealing with an unusual headache? It could be a cervical or cervicogenic headache.…
In a shocking development, YouTuber Praneeth Hanumanthu has become embroiled in controversy following his detention by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. Initially arrested for making offensive remarks during a podcast, Hanumanthu's predicament has escalated, resulting in further allegations under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act after he tested positive for cannabis consumption. The Context of the Detention The origins of Hanumanthu's difficulties can be linked to a podcast he hosted, which included a conversation that many considered highly unseemly. During this episode, he made inappropriate comments regarding the dynamics between a father and daughter, igniting outrage among viewers and critics alike. This incident quickly garnered the attention of both the public and law enforcement, prompting an investigation by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau. The primary allegation centered around his remarks, which were deemed to have crossed the boundaries of acceptable discourse. This scenario raises broader inquiries about accountability and the duties of content creators, particularly in an era where online platforms can amplify messages to a large audience. As a public figure, Hanumanthu's statements carry substantial weight, and the backlash he has encountered signifies society's increasing intolerance towards harmful rhetoric. Charges Related to Substances Things took a turn for the worse for Hanumanthu when, following his arrest, authorities opted to perform a drug test. The results confirmed the presence of cannabis in his system, leading to additional allegations under the NDPS Act. This legislation is a strict law in India aimed at combating substance abuse and trafficking. By testing positive for drug use, Hanumanthu not only worsened his legal troubles but also further tarnished his reputation. The addition of drug-related charges initiates an important discourse about the effects of substance use among influencers and celebrities. Many young individuals look up to figures like Hanumanthu, and such disclosures can have significant consequences on their perceptions and behaviors. The fallout from his actions extends beyond legal issues; it also encompasses the ethical obligations that accompany public visibility. Reactions from the Public and Consequences The public’s reaction to Hanumanthu's arrest has been varied. Many viewers voiced their outrage over both his initial remarks and his later substance use. Social media has been inundated with discussions, memes, and criticisms, illustrating the swift spread of information and opinions in today’s digital environment. Critics contend that individuals like Hanumanthu should be held accountable for their influence, particularly when it concerns endorsing a healthy lifestyle and responsible behavior. On the other hand, some supporters have rallied behind him, advocating for the necessity of empathy and understanding. They highlight the pressures that accompany being a public figure, especially in a hyper-connected world where every action is scrutinized. This divide in public sentiment mirrors a broader societal conversation about celebrity culture, accountability, and the intricacies of mental health and substance use. The Wider Picture of Substance Abuse Hanumanthu's situation is also part of a larger discourse regarding drug abuse in India, especially among the youth. As discussions about mental health and substance use become more widespread, incidents like this underscore the pressing need for awareness and education about addiction and its root causes. The stigma surrounding drug use often hampers open dialogue about the topic, leaving many to endure in silence. Moreover, the legal implications of the NDPS Act spark questions about how society addresses drug-related offenses. While the act aims to deter substance abuse, critics argue that such laws can disproportionately impact certain demographics and do not tackle the underlying causes of addiction. Conversations around harm reduction, rehabilitation, and public health strategies are increasingly relevant within the framework of these laws. Prospects Ahead for Hanumanthu As Hanumanthu navigates the forthcoming legal hurdles, his future remains unpredictable. He faces possible legal repercussions for both his unsatisfactory comments and his substance use, which could greatly affect his career and personal life. The scenario serves as a cautionary example for content creators about the consequences of their expressions and actions, highlighting the need for thoughtful engagement with their audience.…
Nimrat Kaur is an Indian actress celebrated for her contributions to Hindi cinema and American…
Grey divorce refers to the increasing trend of couples aged 50 and older choosing to…